Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:44:41 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> >
> > If set, then fds 0,1,2 will be redirected while the creation
> > template is executed.
> >
> > Note, as Dwight has pointed out, if fd 0 is redirected, then if
> > templates ask f
This commit increases the default timeout used by lxc-start-ephemeral
from 5 to 10, and adds support for an LXC_IP_TIMEOUT override.
Patchset 2:
- Previous patch used a command line arg.
Signed-off-by: John McFarlane
---
src/lxc/lxc-start-ephemeral.in | 2 +-
src/python-lxc/lxc/__init__.py |
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:44:41 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> If set, then fds 0,1,2 will be redirected while the creation
> template is executed.
>
> Note, as Dwight has pointed out, if fd 0 is redirected, then if
> templates ask for input there will be a problem. We could simply
> not redirect
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
---
src/lxc/lxc-create.in | 415 --
1 file changed, 415 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 src/lxc/lxc-create.in
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
deleted file mode 100644
index 439ce51..000
--
Define a sha1sum_file() function in utils.c. Use that in lxcapi_create
to write out the sha1sum of the template being used. If libgnutls is
not found, then the template sha1sum simply won't be printed into the
container config.
This patch also trivially fixes some cases where SYSERROR is used af
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:00:09AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
> > Copy+pasting code for encryption algorithms is really not nice.
> > It means that instead of distributors of your package being able
> > to rely on the fact 'gnutls' is (eg) FIPS ce
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:44:41AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> If set, then fds 0,1,2 will be redirected while the creation
> template is executed.
>
> Note, as Dwight has pointed out, if fd 0 is redirected, then if
> templates ask for input there will be a problem. We could simply
> not redi
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 04:49:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:27:14AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:51:25PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > > Define a sha1sum_file() function in util
Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
> Copy+pasting code for encryption algorithms is really not nice.
> It means that instead of distributors of your package being able
> to rely on the fact 'gnutls' is (eg) FIPS certified, they now have
> to explicitly certify the copy of the code in
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:27:14AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:51:25PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Define a sha1sum_file() function in utils.c (which requires configure.ac
> > > to check for -lcrypto and -lssl). Us
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:51:25PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Define a sha1sum_file() function in utils.c (which requires configure.ac
> > to check for -lcrypto and -lssl). Use that in lxcapi_create to write out
> > the sha1sum of the template b
If set, then fds 0,1,2 will be redirected while the creation
template is executed.
Note, as Dwight has pointed out, if fd 0 is redirected, then if
templates ask for input there will be a problem. We could simply
not redirect fd 0, or we could require that templates work without
interaction. I'm
Quoting Jäkel, Guido (g.jae...@dnb.de):
> Dear Core-Developers,
>
> i would like to ask for a discussion about the status of a kind of
> improvements that -- as I know -- will need support by the kernel developers.
> But a LXC (newbie) user may expect such things from a software level 1.0,
> wi
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:51:25PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Define a sha1sum_file() function in utils.c (which requires configure.ac
> to check for -lcrypto and -lssl). Use that in lxcapi_create to write out
> the sha1sum of the template being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
> c
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:05:53 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:24:43 -0500
> > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:22:47 -0500
> > > > Serge Hallyn wrot
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:55:36 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Dwight Engen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:22:11 -0500
> > > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en..
Dear Core-Developers,
i would like to ask for a discussion about the status of a kind of improvements
that -- as I know -- will need support by the kernel developers. But a LXC
(newbie) user may expect such things from a software level 1.0, will miss it.
In the worst case, this may have impacts
17 matches
Mail list logo