Re: [lxc-devel] Dynamic devices

2013-03-19 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Michael J Coss writes: > On 3/18/2013 11:45 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> I will say what I have said elsewhere recently to ensure the idea >> percolates. What can be implemented now without kernel support and >> that is interesting is devtmpfs emulation. That is a tmpfs >> filesystem inside th

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Containers slow to start after 1600

2013-03-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Benoit Lourdelet (blour...@juniper.net): > Hello Serge, > > I forgot to mention that I removed it already ! Great, thanks. This is something we can to go the linux-kernel m-l with. If you don't mind, I'll send an email and cc: you? --

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Containers slow to start after 1600

2013-03-19 Thread Benoit Lourdelet
Hello Serge, I forgot to mention that I removed it already ! Benoit On 19/03/2013 16:52, "Serge Hallyn" wrote: >Quoting Benoit Lourdelet (blour...@juniper.net): >> Hello Serge, >> >> I put together a small table, running your script for various values : >> >> Time are in seconds, >> >> Numb

Re: [lxc-devel] Dynamic devices

2013-03-19 Thread Michael J Coss
On 3/18/2013 11:45 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I will say what I have said elsewhere recently to ensure the idea > percolates. What can be implemented now without kernel support and > that is interesting is devtmpfs emulation. That is a tmpfs filesystem > inside the container to serve as /de

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Containers slow to start after 1600

2013-03-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Benoit Lourdelet (blour...@juniper.net): > Hello Serge, > > I put together a small table, running your script for various values : > > Time are in seconds, > > Number of veth, time to create, time to delete: > > 500 18 26 > > 1000 57 70 > > 2000 193 250 > > 3000 435 510 > > 4000 7

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Use $localstatedir/log/lxc for default log path

2013-03-19 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 13-03-18 02:13 PM, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> On 13-03-18 01:08 PM, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >>> Hi Serge, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Serge Hallyn >>> wrote: Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry...@gmail.com): > Hi Serge, > Oh

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Fix for ia64: Use __clone2 for ia64 in lxc/start.c

2013-03-19 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 13-03-18 01:19 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dennis Schridde (devuran...@gmx.net): >> Am Montag, 18. März 2013, 11:28:02 schrieb Serge Hallyn: >>> #ifdef __ia64__ >>> stack += stack_size >>> #endif >>> >>> so that the clone call below stays just the slightest bit easier on >>> the eyes.

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Properly cleanup network devices if pinning root filesystem didn't work

2013-03-19 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 13-03-18 03:27 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de): >> Signed-off-by: Christian Seiler > > Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn Pushed to staging, thanks! >> --- >> src/lxc/start.c |2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/l

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Properly handle timeout case in lxc-shutdown

2013-03-19 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 13-03-18 03:28 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de): >> Signed-off-by: Christian Seiler > > Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn Pushed to staging, thanks! >> --- >> src/lxc/lxc-shutdown.in |2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc

Re: [lxc-devel] 0.9 final release, plans for 1.0 and Linux Plumbers 2013

2013-03-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > == What's next == ... > - More integration tests and unit tests in LXC itself. To this end, I'd like to add distro-specific tests under tests/${distro}. I have a set of tests which started under lp:~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-tests and has been migrat

[lxc-devel] 0.9 final release, plans for 1.0 and Linux Plumbers 2013

2013-03-19 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hello, == Final 0.9 release == Thanks again to Daniel for quickly processing the pull request. 0.9~rc1 is now out and is hopefully the last milestone before we release the final 0.9. Starting now, we'll only be taking bugfixes for 0.9, people should refrain from sending patches for new features u

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9~alpha3 pull request

2013-03-19 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/12/2013 01:50 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > You'll find the 0.9.alpha3 pull request below. > > Based on what you did last time, the following should do the trick: > - Review the pull request > - Use "git pull --edit --no-ff --stat git://github.com/lxc/lxc.git", >that shoul

[lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc tag, lxc-0.9.0.rc1, created. 72280e1cd55e0fe3971f6fe2daa7b3e0cece56a1

2013-03-19 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "lxc". The tag, lxc-0.9.0.rc1 has been created at 72280e1cd55e0fe3971f6fe2daa7b3e0cece56a1 (commit) - Log -

[lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc branch, master, updated. 72280e1cd55e0fe3971f6fe2daa7b3e0cece56a1

2013-03-19 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "lxc". The branch, master has been updated via 72280e1cd55e0fe3971f6fe2daa7b3e0cece56a1 (commit) via 9afe19d634946d50eab30e3b