Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Renamed ethX => devN on stop (network phys)

2012-12-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Vitaly Lavrov (vel21r...@gmail.com): > The source of this problem is in linux/net/core/dev.c:default_device_exit() The fix for this is in commit 7b35f3d60a7d007e39b44461181e118bd3942da7: "rename physical nics at shutdown" ---

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-clone

2012-12-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Han Yuejuan-B42073 (b42...@freescale.com): > When I want to clone a container with "lxc-clone -o ctx1 -n ctx2": > There will be some error info about rsync as below: > > Tweaking configuration > Copying rootfs... > rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes to socket [sender]: >

[lxc-devel] [PATCH] oracle template: add support for creating ol4 container from ovm template

2012-12-14 Thread Dwight Engen
Also: disable the interactive part of ovmd so ol5,6 containers won't hang if started for the first time with -d. Don't let containers do rawio, or have access to /dev/rtc0, they can mess up the hosts system clock among other things. Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen --- templates/lxc-oracle.in | 123 +

Re: [lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2, created. 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922

2012-12-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/14/2012 02:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/14/2012 08:41 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 12/14/2012 02:30 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >>> I wasn't expecting another pull from staging until early February and >> Crap ! I misunderstood your email. >> >> Shall I reset the tree to alpha1 (I

Re: [lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2, created. 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922

2012-12-14 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/14/2012 08:41 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12/14/2012 02:30 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> I wasn't expecting another pull from staging until early February and > > Crap ! I misunderstood your email. > > Shall I reset the tree to alpha1 (I am not really in favor of that) ? Or > could we le

Re: [lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2, created. 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922

2012-12-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/14/2012 02:30 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > I wasn't expecting another pull from staging until early February and Crap ! I misunderstood your email. Shall I reset the tree to alpha1 (I am not really in favor of that) ? Or could we let this as it is ?

Re: [lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2, created. 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922

2012-12-14 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/14/2012 03:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was > generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing > the project "lxc". > > The tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2 has been created > at 56655134e462ceaf86b51

[lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc branch, master, updated. 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922

2012-12-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "lxc". The branch, master has been updated via 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922 (commit) via 2a061f55f9496d2c5d315f99

[lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2, created. 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922

2012-12-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "lxc". The tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha2 has been created at 56655134e462ceaf86b51838e4e825c2f3964922 (commit) - Log --