On 12/13/2012 03:59 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.
>>
>> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the
>> following actions are to be done on your side:
>>
>> - Prope
On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.
>
> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the
> following actions are to be done on your side:
>
> - Properly tag 0.8, currently we only have a commit but no matc
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "lxc".
The tag, lxc-0.9.0.alpha1 has been created
at d984bb4e751121f1a7c0029ee7df4acf62f2eea4 (commit)
- Log --
The source of this problem is in linux/net/core/dev.c:default_device_exit()
The problem can be resolved by means of a patch ( for version 0.8.0 )
The patch doesn't solve a problem of disappearance of "dummy", "imq",
"ifb" network devices when closing container ( this is kernel problem
).
lxc_ex
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> If you start more than one lxc-start/lxc-execute with the same name at the
> same time, or just do an lxc-start/lxc-execute with the name of a container
> that is already running, lxc doesn't figure out that the container with this
> name is already
---
templates/lxc-archlinux.in | 359 +++--
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 275 deletions(-)
diff --git a/templates/lxc-archlinux.in b/templates/lxc-archlinux.in
index cf274d4..53e8e22 100644
--- a/templates/lxc-archlinux.in
+++ b/templates/lxc-archlinux.