If you start more than one lxc-start/lxc-execute with the same name at the
same time, or just do an lxc-start/lxc-execute with the name of a container
that is already running, lxc doesn't figure out that the container with this
name is already running until fairly late in the initialization process
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "lxc".
The tag, lxc-0.8.0 has been created
at 4aa7ac35696b87867b1e85410a80527696ff4d64 (commit)
- Log -
On 12/11/2012 10:07 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:56 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
>> On 12/11/2012 09:35 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
>>> Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> For example doing "lxc-execute -n tmpct /bin/bash" will call setup_kmsg(), but
> in this case rootfs->mount/dev directory doesn't even exist so the call to
> symlink fails with ENOENT. Commit f62b3449 made this failure not fatal, but
> we should not
For example doing "lxc-execute -n tmpct /bin/bash" will call setup_kmsg(), but
in this case rootfs->mount/dev directory doesn't even exist so the call to
symlink fails with ENOENT. Commit f62b3449 made this failure not fatal, but
we should not even try it when we know it will fail. See similar code
Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:56 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
> On 12/11/2012 09:35 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
> >> On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> H
On 12/11/2012 09:35 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
>> On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
Hi Daniel,
You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.
Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
> On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.
> >>
> >> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhage
On 12/11/2012 07:23 AM, Alexander Vladimirov wrote:
> 2012/12/11 Jäkel, Guido mailto:g.jae...@dnb.de>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> as i'm using a farm of LXC hosts I want to add a network wire
> feature to the "API wishlist". In fact, this might be some frontend
> daemon, which offers remot
On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.
>>
>> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the
>> following actions are to be done on your side:
>>
>> - Prope
2012/12/11 Jäkel, Guido
> Hi all,
>
> as i'm using a farm of LXC hosts I want to add a network wire feature to
> the "API wishlist". In fact, this might be some frontend daemon, which
> offers remote network access to local LXC in conjunction with a proxy
> client counterpart, which will locall
Hi all,
as i'm using a farm of LXC hosts I want to add a network wire feature to the
"API wishlist". In fact, this might be some frontend daemon, which offers
remote network access to local LXC in conjunction with a proxy client
counterpart, which will locally provide the API of an remote hos
On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.
>
> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the
> following actions are to be done on your side:
>
> - Properly tag 0.8, currently we only have a commit but no matc
13 matches
Mail list logo
