Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de):
> This patch adds a simple notification system that allows the container to
> notify the host (in particular, the lxc-start process) that the boot process
> has been completed successfully. It also adds an additional status BOOTING
> that lxc-info may
> I must admit the details aren't worked out, but the rough idea was
> something like the following. On the host have a directory per
> container, in which the socket is setup
>
>/var/lib/systemd/container/
>
> And bind '/var/lib/systemd/containerXXX' into the container in some
> location,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:12:57PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> >>If we want to have a back-channel, we'd need a socket, which
> >>makes just
> >>doing echo RUNNING > /dev/lxc-notify impossible, you'd need a
> >>special
> >>program for that. Having the template scripts dump an additional
> >>sc
> I'm very pleased about the discussion and efforts to implement such a
> feature because I already have asked for it in former times. In the
> one hand, this fifo approach may be used for more than the current
> task. But in the other hand, it's seems to need a bunch of
> dependencies.
You mean t
>> If we want to have a back-channel, we'd need a socket, which makes
>> just
>> doing echo RUNNING > /dev/lxc-notify impossible, you'd need a
>> special
>> program for that. Having the template scripts dump an additional
>> script
>> or upstart job or systemd unit file or whatever in the contai
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > I like the idea but haven't looked at the implementation yet as the
> > patch is really quite large. Quickly scanning through I briefly noticed
> > that the copyright headers for the new files are wrong (refer to IBM and
> > Dani
Dear Christian, Stéphane and Serge,
>If we want to have a back-channel, we'd need a socket, ...
> [...]
>On the other hand, it wouldn't be too complicated to have two special files
>lying around: ...
I'm very pleased about the discussion and efforts to implement such a feature
because I already
