On 12/05/2011 12:11 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> On 12/04/2011 04:28 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 11/16/2011 05:49 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've run into the same problem as was discussed in BUG #3411497 [1]
>>> and on
>>> the users mailing list [2]. To solve this, I've decided t
On 12/04/2011 04:28 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 05:49 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've run into the same problem as was discussed in BUG #3411497 [1] and on
>> the users mailing list [2]. To solve this, I've decided to implement the
>> patch that was proposed on the maili
On 11/30/2011 01:07 PM, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
> 2011/10/13 Alexey Shabalin :
>> 2011/9/27 Greg Kurz :
>>> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:10 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le vendredi 26 août 2011 à 16:00 +0400, Alexey Shabalin a écrit :
> 2011/8/26 Daniel Lezcano :
>> On 08/23/2011 03:56 PM,
On 11/08/2011 12:49 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> The goal here is to be able to multiplex several event sources in
> lxc-init. It will be a lot easier to add I/O driven features: for
> example, a rexec-like service to start extra commands in a
> container.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz
> Signed-off-by: C
On 11/16/2011 05:49 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've run into the same problem as was discussed in BUG #3411497 [1] and on
> the users mailing list [2]. To solve this, I've decided to implement the
> patch that was proposed on the mailing list [3].
>
> The attached patch is against curren
