On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Theodore Tso writes:
>
>> On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>>> I am totally in favor of not starting the entire world. But just
>>> like I find it convienient to loopback mount an iso image to see
>>> what is on a disk image
Bugs item #3411497, was opened at 2011-09-19 14:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=826303&aid=3411497&group_id=163076
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:32:01PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:59:10PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Lennart Poettering writes:
>>>
To make a standard distribution run nicely in a Linux container you
usually have
Theodore Tso writes:
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> I am totally in favor of not starting the entire world. But just
>> like I find it convienient to loopback mount an iso image to see
>> what is on a disk image. It would be handy to be able to just
>> download a d
da...@lang.hm writes:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> Theodore Tso writes:
>>
>>> On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
I am totally in favor of not starting the entire world. But just
like I find it convienient to loopback mount an iso image to
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> da...@lang.hm writes:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>>> Theodore Tso writes:
>>>
On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> I admit for a lot of test cases that it makes sense not to use a full
>>> se
lxc init modifies a different signal mask in the loop than the one it's
installing with sigaction in the loop. It appears that either these
lines should move outside the loop, or the intent was to clear the
bits of the sa_mask instead of the mask.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
Should the same mask
On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I am totally in favor of not starting the entire world. But just
> like I find it convienient to loopback mount an iso image to see
> what is on a disk image. It would be handy to be able to just
> download a distro image and play with it,
Lennart Poettering writes:
> On Mon, 10.10.11 13:59, Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com) wrote:
>
>> > Quite a few kernel subsystems are
>> > currently not virtualized, for example SELinux, VTs, most of sysfs, most
>> > of /proc/sys, audit, udev or file systems (by which I mean that for a
>
Bugs item #3411497, was opened at 2011-09-19 10:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhwarfield
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=826303&aid=3411497&group_id=163076
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:59:10PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Lennart Poettering writes:
>
> > To make a standard distribution run nicely in a Linux container you
> > usually have to make quite a number of modifications to it and disable
> > certain things from the boot process. Ideally ho
Cc's and subject updated so hopefully we get the correct people
on this discussion to make progress.
Lennart Poettering writes:
> To make a standard distribution run nicely in a Linux container you
> usually have to make quite a number of modifications to it and disable
> certain things from th
On Mon, 10.10.11 13:59, Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com) wrote:
> > Quite a few kernel subsystems are
> > currently not virtualized, for example SELinux, VTs, most of sysfs, most
> > of /proc/sys, audit, udev or file systems (by which I mean that for a
> > container you probably don't wan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:05:30PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> Yes, it does detract from the unique advantages of using a container.
> However, I think the value here is not the effeciency of the initial
> system configuration but the fact that it gives users a better place to
> start.
>
> Right
Ted Ts'o writes:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:05:30PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
>> Yes, it does detract from the unique advantages of using a container.
>> However, I think the value here is not the effeciency of the initial
>> system configuration but the fact that it gives users a better place
Lennart Poettering writes:
> On Mon, 10.10.11 13:59, Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com) wrote:
>> My list of things that still have work left to do looks like:
>> - cgroups. It is not safe to create a new hierarchies with groups
>> that are in existing hierarchies. So cgroups don't wo
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:32:01PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:59:10PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering writes:
> >
> > > To make a standard distribution run nicely in a Linux container you
> > > usually have to make quite a number of modifications to
17 matches
Mail list logo
