Hi,
Ok I take note about inline patches in email.
- About your version of lxc_for_each, your version is a lots better.
My code was totally stupid and non-performant. In fact I based my code
on something else that was needed the scandir, i simply copy/pasted by
laziness. About the full path, in fa
>> is there a possibility to let LXC have control over the external naming of
>> the veth-Device to replace veth by
>something related to a concrete container? E.g. a name assigned by the
>containers configuration, the container name itself or at
>least (maybe as a default) the pid of the lxc-
04.05.2011 14:59, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a possibility to let LXC have control over the external naming of
> the veth-Device to replace veth by something related to a concrete
> container? E.g. a name assigned by the containers configuration, the
> container name itself or at
On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a possibility to let LXC have control over the external naming of
> the veth-Device to replace veth by something related to a concrete
> container? E.g. a name assigned by the containers configuration, the
> container name itself
Hi,
is there a possibility to let LXC have control over the external naming of the
veth-Device to replace veth by something related to a concrete
container? E.g. a name assigned by the containers configuration, the container
name itself or at least (maybe as a default) the pid of the lxc-init
