Well at one point the site was up and fully running and stayed up to date
yes? Thats what i mean.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 06:55 AM, matthew byers wrote:
> > I like the wiki idea as it gives another area where users can post
> > various fixes to issues o
On 02/03/2011 06:55 AM, matthew byers wrote:
> I like the wiki idea as it gives another area where users can post
> various fixes to issues or even tutorials for lxc. That seems to be the
> biggest issue i have come across that people have with lxc itself...lack
> of documentation. I have the websi
On 02/03/2011 03:15 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 06:04 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 02/02/2011 04:53 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 02/01/2011 07:17 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
Just wondering. The last news entry on lxc.sf.net was in June of last
year.
>>>
>>> Yeah, any volunte
On 02/03/2011 07:04 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 01:55 PM, matthew byers wrote:
>> I like the wiki idea as it gives another area where users can post
>> various
>> fixes to issues or even tutorials for lxc. That seems to be the biggest
>> issue i have come across that people have with
On 02/03/2011 03:42 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:24 +0300, matthew byers wrote:
>> I would say keep it in the same location where the website is for
>> simplicity so i guess wp. Put a link on the main site to the wiki
>> sub-site.
> Also, if you use sourceforge's wiki it's
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:24 +0300, matthew byers wrote:
> I would say keep it in the same location where the website is for
> simplicity so i guess wp. Put a link on the main site to the wiki
> sub-site.
Also, if you use sourceforge's wiki it's a mess to handle the
permissions.
For another project
I would say keep it in the same location where the website is for simplicity
so i guess wp. Put a link on the main site to the wiki sub-site.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 01:55 PM, matthew byers wrote:
>
>> I like the wiki idea as it gives another area whe
On 02/03/2011 01:55 PM, matthew byers wrote:
> I like the wiki idea as it gives another area where users can post various
> fixes to issues or even tutorials for lxc. That seems to be the biggest
> issue i have come across that people have with lxc itself...lack of
> documentation. I have the websi
I like the wiki idea as it gives another area where users can post various
fixes to issues or even tutorials for lxc. That seems to be the biggest
issue i have come across that people have with lxc itself...lack of
documentation. I have the websited saved in url but that was weeks and weeks
later a
On 02/03/2011 06:03 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 02:00 AM, matthew byers wrote:
>> rc1 has been released for testing.
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc/files/lxc/lxc-0.7.4/lxc-0.7.4-rc1.tar.gz/download
> I also note that going to
>
>https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc/files/lxc/
On 02/03/2011 06:04 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 04:53 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 02/01/2011 07:17 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> Just wondering. The last news entry on lxc.sf.net was in June of last
>>> year.
>>
>> Yeah, any volunteer to handle the news on the website ?
>
> I could do
11 matches
Mail list logo
