Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Signal stuff v2 and some documentation

Hi, Apologies if this is the wrong list. > > Interestingly, it stays in S state until > > I kill the container. I'm afraid the console functionality (is there > > any documentation for it?) may make lxc-start unsuitable for pushing > > into the background. After all, it is an interactive foregro

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Signal stuff v2 and some documentation

On 06/15/2010 02:13 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: Daniel Lezcano writes: On 06/10/2010 11:47 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: If you provide me with an example (and some description of lxc.console), I can give it some testing and concretize this pure guesswork. lxc-create -n ubuntu -f

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Signal stuff v2 and some documentation

On 06/15/2010 04:47 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Daniel Lezcano writes: > >> On 06/15/2010 02:13 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> Daniel Lezcano writes: >>> On 06/10/2010 11:47 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > If you provide me with an example (and some description of > lxc.console), I

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/2] some cleanup around lxc-create

On 06/15/2010 01:59 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > I had a go against lxc-create trying to debug the console issue. > There is still a serious issue: the template scripts use some 'arch' > binary, which isn't present on my system. What is that? Why not use > 'uname -m' instead? > There i

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Signal stuff v2 and some documentation

Daniel Lezcano writes: > On 06/15/2010 02:13 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Daniel Lezcano writes: >> >>> On 06/10/2010 11:47 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> If you provide me with an example (and some description of lxc.console), I can give it some testing and concretize this pu

Re: [lxc-devel] [RFC][PATCH][lxc]: unfreeze while stopping

On 06/09/2010 07:29 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Michel Normand [norm...@fr.ibm.com] wrote: > | Le mardi 08 juin 2010 à 19:07 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu a écrit : > |> I am not too sure, but if user wants to stop a container is there a > |> reason not to implicitly unfreeze the container and

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Signal stuff v2 and some documentation

Daniel Lezcano writes: > On 06/10/2010 11:47 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> If you provide me with an example (and some description of >> lxc.console), I can give it some testing and concretize this pure >> guesswork. > > lxc-create -n ubuntu -f ~/mynetwork.conf -t ubuntu > lxc-start -n ubuntu -s

[lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] correct template directory documentation

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner --- doc/lxc-create.sgml.in | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/lxc-create.sgml.in b/doc/lxc-create.sgml.in index 5505eea..f3e8524 100644 --- a/doc/lxc-create.sgml.in +++ b/doc/lxc-create.sgml.in @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ Fou

[lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/2] some cleanup around lxc-create

Hi, I had a go against lxc-create trying to debug the console issue. There is still a serious issue: the template scripts use some 'arch' binary, which isn't present on my system. What is that? Why not use 'uname -m' instead? Thanks, Feri. Ferenc Wagner (2): remove misleading copy&paste comm

[lxc-devel] [PATCH 1/2] remove misleading copy&paste comment

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner --- src/lxc/lxc-create.in |5 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in index ee5173e..16011ab 100644 --- a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in @@ -20,11 +20,6 @@ # License al

[lxc-devel] Question using macvlan

Hi, I think this is a frequently asked question, but I can't find the answer ... The host machine has 2 NIC, eth0 and eth1. eth0 is used a an internal and eth1 is used as an external interface. The lxc-container is setup using a macvlan interface in bridge mode on eth0 with a static ip address.