Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Sorry... Long quote of my own post with no snip. Too much is relevant... On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 23:43 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote: > > : - snip > > > I haven't played with ipv6 for some years, but i'm sure that your > > problems c

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote: : - snip > I haven't played with ipv6 for some years, but i'm sure that your > problems can be fixed without much work. For starters i would try > something like this: > interface foo inet6 manual > pre-up ifconfig foo up Well, it w

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote: > > I just find the whole networking model in Debian to be frustrating. It > > is probably the number 1 primary reason why I don't use Debian more and > > won't be incorporating it into future projects. > Now, this is really offtopic on thi

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael Holzt
> I just find the whole networking model in Debian to be frustrating. It > is probably the number 1 primary reason why I don't use Debian more and > won't be incorporating it into future projects. Now, this is really offtopic on this list, but i feel that you might have missed how flexible the d

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Suno, On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 23:27 +0100, Suno Ano wrote: > Combining forces would be great. I just took a glance at > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc-provider/ and the thing that sprung > my eyes are > > - it is a bit Ubuntu focused as it is coded right now > - assumes using a bridge i.e.

Re: [lxc-devel] [patch 3/3][RFC] implement lxc-cmd and lxc-enter using lxc_cinit daemon

2010-01-24 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Dietmar Maurer wrote: > After locking at the init-logger patches, it seems that it requires a > major rework because the lxc_start code changed quite much. Unfortunately, > I am not too familiar with the current code. > > Daniel, would you mind to rework the old patches to get at least the basic >

Re: [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Suno Ano wrote: > Hi folks, > > when cloning from [0], there are a bunch of excellent tools like for > example lxc-status. What about including those into mainline lxc utils? > > > [0] git clone git://git.nigel.mcnie.name/lxc-debian.git Hi guys, there is people writing tools to create the cont