Joe Bloggs84 wrote:
> [..] I came to the
> realisation that I had the first parameter of lwip_select wrong - I had
> read the docs (quickly) as it being the count+1 of the number of fd
That's the windows way, I think...
> rather than "one more than the maximum fd value".
... and that's the p
On 18/01/2012 6:29 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Ian Wilson wrote:
This all works for the first connection. The problem is that incoming
packets are not "detected" by lwip_select for subsequent connections to
the listener (after closing the first connection of course).
[..]
Is this something
Ian Wilson wrote:
> This all works for the first connection. The problem is that incoming
> packets are not "detected" by lwip_select for subsequent connections to
> the listener (after closing the first connection of course).
> [..]
> Is this something obvious? If not I will provide some code
Hello all,
I can provide more details than this (incl. lwip debgs and wireshark
logs) but I wanted to find out first if there is something obvious
before imposing on people to parse my detailed data. I have tried to
search for relevant Q&A's but with no success.
I have a lwip based system r
