How much timeout have you set in your socket option? If receive timeout works
then select should work too (I have not tested it myself though). One last
thing to check is, try to increase timeout value and see if you get some data
or not.
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
From: pekez
Sent: Tuesday, March
Header files are well documented. Just try to open it once:
#define PPPERR_CONNECT 6 /* Connection lost. */
I think you need to check if your APN settings are correct and if you have
select right Authentication method selected. For me PPPAUTHTYPE_ANY works.
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
From: A
If you do not use select call, Are you able to receive anything? It may be
possible that since there is no data available select will eventually timeout.
Regards,
Ajay bhargav
From: pekez
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 6:17 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwip_select
Hi Nenad,
Did you check errno?
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
From: pekez
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 5:51 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: [lwip-users] lwip_select never returns value > 0
Hi people,
I am trying to use lwip_select in combination with lwip_recv. I have
done it like this s
I agree ESP8266 LwIP stack is heavily modified and source provided with
FreeRTOS sdk it never compiles. I even post on forum but no response from dev
team. Most of the errors were of implicit function declaration, stack is
calling functions in library with no header file defining its prototype.
Jeff,
I have tested Ethernet ←→ PPP using NAT. I am sure it can work for ESP8266 too
for wifi, Though I have not tested myself. ESP SDK uses older version of lwIP.
I am managing a NAT port from RT-Thread on GitHub. You can try those patches on
ESP.
Ref: https://github.com/ajaybhargav/lwip_nat
I guess you need to check memory configuration. How much RAM do you have? Are
you using memory pool or malloc?
One thing to note here, I have written modified vfs layer for both my systems
as none of them use FatFS. I don’t know if that will have any impact as such.
You better check your lwIP op
I am using this FTP server on two of my devices (ARM board and ESP8266) and it
works perfectly fine. Can you enable FTP debug prints and see where exactly it
is failing?
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: nrichard
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:35 PM
To: lwip-users@n
I personally like this implementation for FTP. It has file system backend with
abstraction layer.
https://github.com/toelke/lwip-ftpd
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
www.8051projects.net
From: Sergio R. Caprile
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 6:04 PM
To: lwip-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [lwip-users]
If you have already implemented it or planning to do it then why don’t you
contribute and submit the patch? Let devs review it.
- Ajay Bhargav
From: Aditya Prakash
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 9:56 AM
To: lwip-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [lwip-users] SO_BINDTODEVICE Support
Hi,
I ran into
You can add a simpler statement in such case:
#ifndef LWIP_NOASSERT
(void)err;
#endif
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
www.8051projects.net
From: Nirav Desai
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 2:29 PM
To: lwip-de...@nongnu.org
Cc: lwip-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [lwip-users] LWIP : Get rid of warnings when LWI
Hi Brian,
You can try uhttpd from ethernut project.
http://www.ethernut.de/
I feel it can be easily ported to any system. Download complete source and look
into nut/pro/uhttp directory. Hope it helps.
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Brian Stull
Sent: Thursday, Decemb
Hi All,
This has been shared on the forum already, I ported NAT source from RT-Thread
to latest git version and anyone who wants to test it. I have tested it with
PPP and Ethernet setup and it works wonderfully.
Repo is located at: https://github.com/ajaybhargav/lwip_nat
Hope it will help othe
Hi All,
I have finished migration from 1.4.x to 2.0.0. I want to understand the
implementation difference in lwIP timers of both versions. I am not getting any
debug messages from tcpip thread or timers. So maybe some light on
implementation might help.
Thanks,
Ajay Bhargav
Sent from Mail fo
I already did.. just need to test it now 😊
From: Sergio R. Caprile
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 6:05 PM
To: lwip-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.0.0 released
> Great work. Need to find the time to move from 1.41 to 2.0 J
Same here.
Congrats to all the team, you guys rule!
Hi Sylvain,
> Hi Ajay,
>
> What you are looking for is a NAT[1] implementation, not basic IP routing[2],
> lwIP does not provide NAT at all. There used to be a basic NAT feature merged
> in, but it was removed because the one who proposed the patch wasn't allowed
> to do so.
>
> NAT, other th
> Hi Ajay,
>
> This is a bit hard to answer an open question like yours.
>
> Anyway, last time I tried, IP forwarding between a PPP session (whatever the
> low level protocol used) and an Ethernet interface works smoothly.
> However, you have to use the Git head, at least IP forwarding between PP
17 matches
Mail list logo
