[lvs-users] Source Hashing (Again)

2010-09-29 Thread Darren.Mansell
Hello everyone. We have a 2 node load-balanced MySQL cluster running in active-active mode. Linux-HA is running on each with LVS balancing connections on the nodes themselves. This works great for other production clusters but the MySQL nodes require connection jailing, i.e. a single client

Re: [lvs-users] Source Hashing (Again)

2010-09-29 Thread Malcolm Turnbull
On 29 September 2010 11:36, wrote: > Hello everyone. > > > > We have a 2 node load-balanced MySQL cluster running in active-active > mode. Linux-HA is running on each with LVS balancing connections on the > nodes themselves. > > > So for this we use source hashing investigating after looking thro

Re: [lvs-users] Source Hashing (Again)

2010-09-29 Thread Darren.Mansell
-Original Message- From: lvs-users-boun...@linuxvirtualserver.org [mailto:lvs-users-boun...@linuxvirtualserver.org] On Behalf Of Malcolm Turnbull Sent: 29 September 2010 13:32 To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Source Hashing (Again) On 29 September 20

Re: [lvs-users] Source Hashing (Again)

2010-09-29 Thread Malcolm Turnbull
On 29 September 2010 14:31, wrote: > > > Am I right in thinking that if a single client makes its first > connection to node1 then as long as there are connections made before > the persistence time-out they will be made to the same real server > again? Yes. >But then if the weight changes to 0

Re: [lvs-users] postfix problem - lost connection after CONNECT

2010-09-29 Thread George Machitidze
Thanks Michael Is this applicable for our LVS server if we are trying to connect *to the* *VIP of this LVS server* *from* the *LVS server* itself and there will be no need to change our rules, just an upgrade of kernel? Where can we find the patch for kernel? I don't see any changes in mainline *