On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:36 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I monitor how well my LVS servers are performing? More
> specifically, how do I tell whether they're hitting their limits?
You could install Nagios for monitoring services. Or take a look at
collectd. They're both packages tha
thus L.S. Keijser spake:
> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:36 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do I monitor how well my LVS servers are performing? More
>> specifically, how do I tell whether they're hitting their limits?
>
> You could install Nagios for monitoring services. Or take a look at
>
On 17/12/09 08:28, L.S. Keijser wrote:
> You could install Nagios for monitoring services. Or take a look at
> collectd. They're both packages that are specifically designed for
> such a task.
and on 17/12/09 08:35, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> In case you're already using net-snmp-lvs, I may presume
Robin Bowes wrote:
> I'm actually using OpenNMS, so yes, I have monitoring software in
> place. However, it was my understanding that LVS CPU usage didn't
> register on normal monitoring tools, ie. "top" doesn't show LVS CPU
> usage. If I am mistaken, then please tell me as that will answer my
> q
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 10:30 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robin Bowes wrote:
>
> > I'm actually using OpenNMS, so yes, I have monitoring software in
> > place. However, it was my understanding that LVS CPU usage didn't
> > register on normal monitoring tools, ie. "top" doesn't show LVS CPU
> > usage.
On 17/12/09 09:30, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robin Bowes wrote:
>
>> I'm actually using OpenNMS, so yes, I have monitoring software in
>> place. However, it was my understanding that LVS CPU usage didn't
>> register on normal monitoring tools, ie. "top" doesn't show LVS CPU
>> usage. If I am mistaken, t
This doesn't seem to be in ldirectord, and it would seem to be a nice
addition.
Has anyone looked at implementing this?
Many thanks
Darren Mansell
___
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserve
Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 12:37:11 schrieb darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk:
> This doesn't seem to be in ldirectord, and it would seem to be a nice
> addition.
>
>
>
> Has anyone looked at implementing this?
>
>
>
> Many thanks
>
> Darren Mansell
This is the task if the ipvs kernel module. The
I'm using ldirectord to load LVS modules rather than the ipvsadm init script.
Man ipvsadm says you need to start the ipvsadm sync daemon using --start-daemon
state and --stop-daemon. As ldirectord is doing the loading / unloading of
ipvsadm rules then I think the ldirectord script itself needs t
Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 16:22:08 schrieb darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk:
> I'm using ldirectord to load LVS modules rather than the ipvsadm init
> script. Man ipvsadm says you need to start the ipvsadm sync daemon using
> --start-daemon state and --stop-daemon. As ldirectord is doing the load
> -Original Message-
> From: lvs-users-boun...@linuxvirtualserver.org [mailto:lvs-users-
> boun...@linuxvirtualserver.org] On Behalf Of
> darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:22 AM
> To: lvs-users@linuxvirtualserver.org
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS Sync in Ld
Exactly what I thought. Off to learn Perl ;) Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: lvs-users-boun...@linuxvirtualserver.org
[mailto:lvs-users-boun...@linuxvirtualserver.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Schwartzkopff
Sent: 17 December 2009 15:37
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 16:37 +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 16:22:08 schrieb darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk:
> > I'm using ldirectord to load LVS modules rather than the ipvsadm init
> > script. Man ipvsadm says you need to start the ipvsadm sync daemon using
> >
I have a working LVS-NAT setup, in that clients are able to access services
on the VIP's. But my real servers (rs) are unable to ping/mail/http/access
anything outside the NAT.
I've been getting mixed information from reading around, I've read on:
http://www.centos.org/docs/2/rhl-ig-as-x86-en-2.1/
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, devnull wrote:
> I have a working LVS-NAT setup, in that clients are able
> to access services on the VIP's. But my real servers (rs)
> are unable to ping/mail/http/access anything outside the
> NAT.
yup. You have to punch a hole somewhere.
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LV
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:37:11AM -, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
> This doesn't seem to be in ldirectord, and it would seem to be a nice
> addition.
>
>
>
> Has anyone looked at implementing this?
Hi,
the major problem that I have had with implementing this in the past is that
a)
16 matches
Mail list logo