Hello,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> here are the results of some tests that I ran today.
> They seem to indicate that this problem is real.
>
> - if (svc->port)
> + if (svc->port) {
> + IP_V
Hello everyone.
We are using LVS in quite a large way (volume, distribution and
importance) in solutions that we have implemented for our business. The
way we are using LVS seems to work very nicely but I would appreciate it
if anyone could look at our set up and see if they can see any potenti
On 25/11/09 13:22, Robin Bowes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been building out a platform that uses the net-snmp-lvs module to
> monitor LVS stats. In testing, it worked just fine. I'm graphing
> connection rate, packet rate, and byte rate for the virtual service and
> each of the real servers.
>
> Howev
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:49 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> No-one got any thoughts on this?
I'd hazard a guess that the counters wrapped once (or more) inside your
polling period. This is a common problem when collecting counter-type
data which wraps.
Not having any experience of the SNMP module, ca
In case this is a no-top-post list, my response is below.
On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:57 AM,
wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
>
>
> We are using LVS in quite a large way (volume, distribution and
> importance) in solutions that we have implemented for our business. The
> way we are using LVS seems to wo
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 11:57 +, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
> We are using LVS in quite a large way (volume, distribution and
> importance) in solutions that we have implemented for our business.
> As I said above, this seems to work absolutely fine in production use,
> we rely heavily
On 08/12/09 14:20, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:49 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
>> No-one got any thoughts on this?
>
> I'd hazard a guess that the counters wrapped once (or more) inside your
> polling period. This is a common problem when collecting counter-type
> data which wraps
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 16:27 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> So, looks like that might be the problem; lvsServiceStatsConns is 32-bit.
I thought so.
> I wonder if it's as simple as changing ASN_COUNTER to ASN_COUNTER64 in
> the appropriate place in lvs.c ?
Hrm... this is in the SNMP module code, righ
On 08/12/09 16:27, Robin Bowes wrote:
> So, looks like that might be the problem; lvsServiceStatsConns is 32-bit.
Wrong!
> I wonder if it's as simple as changing ASN_COUNTER to ASN_COUNTER64 in
> the appropriate place in lvs.c ?
Well, I don't think it will hurt, but it didn't fix things.
I trie
On 08/12/09 18:09, Robin Bowes wrote:
> Notice that ipvsadm reports "02 for connection rate too,
That should, of course, be "0".
I guess I need to raise a bug about the ipvsadm issue.
R.
___
Please read the documentation before posting - it's availabl
10 matches
Mail list logo
