Hello Fritz,
I had asked "how to create NewWorld bootblock (bootstrap) with different size than
is supported by OFI" to use for booting from it. So, what was your way how to create
partition which was called by you as NewWorld bootblock (bootstrap) with bigger size?
Correct way to create that
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Peter Golis wrote:
> Hello Fritz,
>
> I had asked "how to create NewWorld bootblock (bootstrap) with different
> size than is supported by OFI" to use for booting from it. So, what was
> your way how to create partition which was called by you as NewWorld
> bootbl
Hello Fritz,
Yes, I had shown to you approx. the same steps as are done by automatic installation process. But this is different was as you are describing as "bug in installer". Could you please show picture of creation partition type Apple_Bootstrap with system NewWorld bootblock? You can take a
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Peter Golis wrote:
> Hello Fritz,
>
> Yes, I had shown to you approx. the same steps as are done by automatic
> installation process. But this is different was as you are describing as
> "bug in installer". Could you please show picture of creation partition
> ty
Hello Fritz,
This makes sense to me. You cannot find linux root partition from harddisk and
you are doing setup for advanced user. If those your steps will not work, then
you will make storm flood about wrong installer.
Please don't do it. If you want to help with testing, then use technical
Peter, et al:
Correct, there is no need to continue . . . first thing, you never
introduced yourself to me as an installer dev or what capacity you were
functioning in. However, it appears that you don't have a clear
understanding of what I was saying, because you kept asking the same
questions .
Hello Fritz,
If you get that errors 20 times in a row, then you have clear way how to
reproduce it and also information about evidence (logs). That was what I had
asked several times, but nothing was provided.
If you will have it, then come back please.
P.
Fritz Hudnut wrote:
>Peter, et al
