Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

On Wed, 11 May 2016 02:03:55 +0200 Julien Lavergne wrote: > 2016-05-10 2:41 GMT+02:00 Simon Quigley : > > Phill, > > > > On 05/09/16 19:06, Phill. Whiteside wrote: > >> As part of this testing, I will be making a server available for > >> Mediawiki just the same as a WordPress one looks after our

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Hi Boss, as much as for this reason, having the LXQt wiki area 'sandboxed' in its own area, away from our LTS's, point releases and standard releases just makes sense. Our task page[1] is a large enough beast as it is, without adding a duality which 16.10, 17.04 etc LXQt will bring. If, and when,

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

2016-05-10 2:41 GMT+02:00 Simon Quigley : > Phill, > > On 05/09/16 19:06, Phill. Whiteside wrote: >> As part of this testing, I will be making a server available for >> Mediawiki just the same as a WordPress one looks after our lubuntu site >> [2] We have tried to make moin 'sexy'[3] but let us not

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

But let's not assume anything yet. You never know. :) -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

But let's not assume anything yet. You never know. :) -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

It seems that the finer phrasing is irrelevent... 2 votes for moin and everyone else voting for a fresh, new look. But, of course, there may be a late rally of moin supporters I've never run a poll before, it's quite exilerating Regards, Phill. On 10 May 2016 at 06:03, Walter Lapchynsk

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Also, this *is* how you use Doodle: https://doodle.com/poll-maker On May 9, 2016 8:08 PM, "Simon Quigley" wrote: > Fine, but that's not how you use Doodle. :) > > -- > Simon Quigley > tsimo...@ubuntu.com > tsimonq2 on Freenode > > -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modi

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Fb areas and G+ posted it will be very interesting to see how many people actually give a shit and can be bothered to move a couple of fingers and make a vote. I can't recall if we have actually done this since the users voted for a new drupal theme for lubuntu.net which Mario refused to accep

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

It works. On May 9, 2016 8:08 PM, "Simon Quigley" wrote: > Fine, but that's not how you use Doodle. :) > > -- > Simon Quigley > tsimo...@ubuntu.com > tsimonq2 on Freenode > > -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Doodle is a polling mechanism that anyone can participate in, so got can include whomever you want with nothing more than a link. I'll set it up for you if you're unfamiliar. On May 9, 2016 7:58 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote: Hi Walter, does Doodle have just under 8,000 people and similar for the

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Fine, but that's not how you use Doodle. :) -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

That is unfortunate as I'm pasting doodle to all our social media areas. Phill. On 10 May 2016 at 04:03, Simon Quigley wrote: > Doodle is not an online community. It's a polling spot. > > And either way, I think Walter misspoke. Doodle is for scheduling, not > polling. > > I've just given up an

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Hi Walter, I think you will find an email I am not totally unfamiliar with online voting systems :) Regards, Phill. On 10 May 2016 at 04:01, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > Doodle is a polling mechanism that anyone can participate in, so got can > include whomever you want with nothing more th

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Doodle is not an online community. It's a polling spot. And either way, I think Walter misspoke. Doodle is for scheduling, not polling. I've just given up and used Google Forms: http://goo.gl/forms/l5LjivGYUJ -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-users mailing l

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Hi Walter, does Doodle have just under 8,000 people and similar for the facebook page (15,000) But, i follow orders On 10 May 2016 at 03:33, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > Having it be exclusively on Facebook makes no sense. Make a Doodle poll or > something of the sort and link it to all the

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

+1 On 05/09/16 21:33, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > Having it be exclusively on Facebook makes no sense. Make a Doodle poll > or something of the sort and link it to all the places. > > On May 9, 2016 7:31 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" > wrote: > > 7,769 members >

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Poll or MediaWiki? Because the latter would be a waste of time and effort because we haven't decided on anything yet. -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

I was not aware it was a vote let me set one up for everyone to be aware of. Phillw On 10 May 2016 at 03:22, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > So what I hear is, on the proposal of making a separate wiki server for > LXQt, the voting is as follows: > > In favor: 1 > Against: 2 > > How does everyon

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

So what I hear is, on the proposal of making a separate wiki server for LXQt, the voting is as follows: In favor: 1 Against: 2 How does everyone else vote? On May 9, 2016 7:18 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote: > Hi Walter, > > we have exactly ONE page for LXQt How is having two operating system

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Hi Walter, we have exactly ONE page for LXQt How is having two operating systems running side by side a better case of having two wiki areas? We are committed to Qt and it appears Ubuntu are committed to moving from Moinmoin to MediaWiki. Have a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Develope

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

You seem to be missing the fact that we all agree that MediaWiki is better than Moin. I don't want two wikis to have to maintain. If we can have someone else do the work of securing and maintaining our wiki, it's less for us to deal with. It would be the same for our WordPress site of we let Canoni

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Why do you think lubuntu.me is not hosted with canonical, yet they did the trade mark registration? They are paying for the domain and the hosting comes free. I'll chat to Alf and Julien about what wiki structure is best, writing up a wiki structure in moin that is not compatible with MediaWiki

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Greetings, On 05/09/16 20:14, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > I'm up for what the boss, i.e. the team, agrees on, too. My vote is to > continue to use Moin. Ubuntu is done with it and are working on fixing > the scripts so they can move entirely over to MediaWiki. Everything > already on Moin will get

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

I'm up for what the boss, i.e. the team, agrees on, too. My vote is to continue to use Moin. Ubuntu is done with it and are working on fixing the scripts so they can move entirely over to MediaWiki. Everything already on Moin will get magically converted. If we make our own thing, we have administr

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Well, it is vote time. I'm for not the fact that even fedora devs had a makeshift script to convert things from moin to mediawiki[1] Any one wanting to make a new project under moinmoin is making for more work in the future. But, I'm up for what the boss says. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MoinM

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

IMHO we should write everything in MoinMoin then wait for the conversion so people can still view the wiki now and continue to hack on it but when the conversion runs, we have everything already available and set in place. -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

So, simon... have LXQt under moin and await transfer to MediaWiki, or make it MediaWiki from the outset? IMHO, we go for for MediaWiki from the 1st page. Phill. On 10 May 2016 at 01:41, Simon Quigley wrote: > Phill, > > On 05/09/16 19:06, Phill. Whiteside wrote: > > As part of this testing, I

Re: [lubuntu-users] [lubuntu-devel] LXQt wiki area

Phill, On 05/09/16 19:06, Phill. Whiteside wrote: > As part of this testing, I will be making a server available for > Mediawiki just the same as a WordPress one looks after our lubuntu site > [2] We have tried to make moin 'sexy'[3] but let us not be under any > illusion, moin wiki looks like a d