Has there been any advancement in following this up?
The .net site still appears at the top of the search results, and
remains wildly out of date.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608306
Title:
Lubuntu.me is the only official and accurate one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608306
Title:
Confusing for users with many websites
Status in Lubuntu Artwork:
In Progress
Status in Lubunt
So, which one is the official site?
lubuntu.net or lubuntu.me ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608306
Title:
Confusing for users with many websites
Status in Lubuntu Artwork:
In Progress
St
** Also affects: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608306
Title:
Confusing for users with many websites
Stat
The slideshow is tracked in bug 1645564.
** No longer affects: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu Xenial)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Changed in: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in:
** Also affects: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)
--
You
** Changed in: lubuntu-artwork
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Also affects: lubuntu-website
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lubuntu-website
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: lubuntu-website
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lubuntu (lubuntu-desk
Phill you have been asked to step aside from all activity involving the
Lubuntu project. That includes bug reports etc. You agreed to do this
with the UCC, so I remind you, please stop writing disruptive posts like
these as it is not constructive in anyway.
Scarlett on behalf of the UCC.
--
You
That seems like a bug soon to be resolved! Thank you for time and
effort! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608306
Title:
Confusing for users with many websites
Status in Lubuntu Artwork:
lubuntu.me is now officially under Canonical's ownership, so at least
from the perspective of a whois, the site is official.
Next will be moving the WordPress install to Canonical's hosting, so a
ping will point to Canonical as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 06:03:04 -
Mario Behling wrote:
> not receive an email or chat message from you about problems with
I honestly don't care what is offical that much I think what is maintained and
updated is more important.
--
Brendan Perrine
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-us
I think lubuntu.org is the best domain name+extension to set as official
web home. I see nonsense to create others as .me
If the problem is the content maintainment, the solution is to fix the
content maintainment and/or content manager team.
lubuntu.me only has a future if .prg and .net are both
@Mario, as Michael Hall, a member of the Ubuntu Community Council said,
bug comments are not the place for arguments. Let's keep the discussion
on topic.
The problem is that users are confused about the two websites.
lubuntu.me came into existence due to a lack of control at lubuntu.net,
which wa
The discussion on this issue is out of scope and full of erroneous
information. For this reason, I will have to answer against my usual
behaviour of making a long thread even longer.
* @Rafael: Thank you for the update on your website. Though, I do not
understand why you do not update the links on
Thank you, Einar. I contacted with the DuckDuckGo guys, and they were
very kind. They also made a custom search command (#lubuntu) for us!
Regarding the new site, I must say it all began as a simple blog coming
along the main website. One of its functions was informing about the
updates, install p
Thank you all for your answers! Great that you have gotten lubuntu.me as
official on duckduckgo. (It's where I do my searches.) Also great that
the official site is the most up to date and with a nice, modern look!
And now looking even more official, with some added info in the footer.
All these th
In a continued effort to give legitimacy to lubuntu.me or at least
remove it from lubuntu.net, Mario has been removed as
owner/administrator of ~lubuntu-desktop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160
Bug comments are not for arguments, if you are not adding information
needed to fix this bug, please refrain from commenting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608306
Title:
Confusing for users w
@phillw First, I'm not coming up with excuses at all. Also, I was always
taught if there's a will there's a way, so I'll just keep on trying, but
I appreciate the history. I just don't think it's a good idea to just
put up with things the way they are simply because that's the way they
have been. T
@wxl The GetLubuntu page was out of date upon point release. Is this the best
excuse you can up with? But, good luck in getting a founding father of lubuntu
to release the name, He has the documents from the Canonical trade mark team.
But, as when we had a young group of volunteers (pre adoption
@phillw You seem to be confused. If you look at the comments above,
you'll find that the issue is not about finding the latest releases.
That's the problem that GetLubuntu seeks to solve and it mostly does
that (except for the fact that lubuntu.net includes direct links to
images, which some users
@wxl
you are wrong. The site GetLubuntu is the gold standard. Having it not fully up
to date is a betrayal of everything that wiki / docs team have striven for.
I've had rows with OMGUbuntu over them announcing releases before they are
there etc. Latterly, they were happy to take any hints of u
@phillw While that was a good improvement, it doesn't keep him from
including direct links, which, again, are often behind. Users cannot be
expected to click on a link to get to a page of links when the links are
right there. This is the issue.
As a team, we are working on finding a better resolut
@wxl The entry on lubuntu.net points to getlubuntu. I had to a lot of nagging,
but now the getlubuntu wiki page is updated, anyone landing on lubuntu.net will
get the correct version. This is why the importance is that getlubuntu MUST be
up to date. All areas should always point to the GetLubunt
@phillw If you look carefully, there's no reference to lubuntu.net on
that page. Also, as I know that you know, we've had a lot of problems
getting anything updated on lubuntu.net. Among other reasons, Mario is
always away. No one else has access to the page. The problem has been
ongoing for a long
26 matches
Mail list logo
