On 08/15/2015 11:01 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking of using fcitx instead of ibus for the input method by
default on Lubuntu, since ibus launch a lot of stuff by default and
fcitx has good feedbacks.
Do people who use input method have some comments on fcitx usage ? I
would be
Makes sense. I am okay with the move as long as it doesn't break everything
:)
--
Have a nice day,
Simon Quigley
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
i have not tried fcitx but have had good luck with scim. in any case, ibus
devs seem to be non-responsive, so anything other than ibus will be great.
@wxl | http://polka.bike
Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
Ubuntu Membership Board & LoCo C
Will everything easily pick up and use fcitx instead?
Julien Lavergne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking of using fcitx instead of ibus for the input method by
> default on Lubuntu, since ibus launch a lot of stuff by default and
> fcitx has good feedbacks.
>
> Do people who use input method have som
My experience with Fcitex is better than with iBus. This one keeps being
buggy with some apps. When I had to use foreign (CJK) characters Fcitex
worked better. Ubuntu Kylin is using it by default.
On 15/08/15 19:01, Julien Lavergne wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking of using fcitx instead of ibus for th
Hi,
Maybe we can have some QA testers do some benchmarks side-by-side(in VMs)
and see, first of all, what is preferred, and second of all, what is faster
running with the same circumstances.
I myself am open to the idea.
--
Have a nice day,
Simon Quigley
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-u
Hi,
I'm thinking of using fcitx instead of ibus for the input method by default
on Lubuntu, since ibus launch a lot of stuff by default and fcitx has good
feedbacks.
Do people who use input method have some comments on fcitx usage ? I would
be very interesting to have some feedbacks (I don't real
