ed. The synaptic version is the same i've on another
> setup (Debian) where it is working as expected.
>
Quick Search is not installed by default because it swamps low resource
systems. If you want it install apt-xapian-index.
--
Yorvyk
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.ne
h the 3.2.0-17 ppc kernel?
>
Have you read through https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PowerPCKnownIssues and
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PowerPCFAQ
--
Yorvyk
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
last one with out appears to be the Pentium M from 2003-2005.
--
Yorvyk
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
RAM and that was quite usable. I currently
>have a 2.4 Ghz P4 machine with 256 MiB of RAM and a 500Mhz PIII with 640 MiB
>RAM side-by-side and the user experience is about the same.
--
Yorvyk
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.
ity
LED though :) but, as old machine generally only have USB 1, it doesn't matter.
Just remember to be patient as installs can take up to 4 or more hours which
means the screen saver can and scren blanking can occur.
--
Yorvyk
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post
iki area.
>
I thought it was 300MHz, but it is a 400 MHz PPC 750 G3 processor iMac (with a
dodgy screen that now appears to have died :(
--
Yorvyk
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lu
On 20/05/13 19:25, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hi,
this one almost sneaked under the radar! A few weeks after each release
there are a number of sessions held for people who are either new, or
wanting to get a bit more involved with the development / testing /
documentation / advocacy etc.
At short
On 25/05/13 16:59, Nio Wiklund wrote:
Hi everybody,
I suggest that we try to make a Lubuntu iso file, that can boot in
'all' computers with intel/amd CPUs.
Why? I fail to see any benefit from this.
It used to be possible with 32-bit systems, but now there are more
and more UEFI systems, whic
On 02/06/13 20:40, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
If our Devs can *not *do it, only then, we can seek a community spin or
whatever they call it.
It's not a case of whether anybody can do it. It's who's going to
support it.
:)
From my simple and basic knowledge, it may not require so much time
On 04/06/13 21:35, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>
hardware that is too old to install Lubuntu from a current LiveCD or
Alternate CD
I'm baffled by this. What hardware is too old? I've installed Lubuntu
from the alternate CD onto several machines from the last century and
the only problems have b
On 05/06/13 01:01, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Yorvyk mailto:yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
On 04/06/13 21:35, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>
hardware that is too old to install Lubuntu from a current LiveCD or
Alternate CD
On 05/06/13 12:50, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Hi Phill,
Thank you for your reply but I appreciate if the devs could answer my Qs
because what you have said I'm aware of and this is what we tell our new
users. I am asking for more information :)
An excellent explanation here: https://wiki.ubunt
On 05/06/13 13:27, Erick Brunzell wrote:
On 06/04/2013 01:59 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
2013/6/3 Jonathan Marsden:
But, back to the 'lubuntu-core' vs 'lubuntu-desktop' issue, I'd
prefer that we take an approach similar to that of Edubuntu where
they offer additional installation options on the
LTS - Long Term Support - A few thoughts.
While Canonical have a definition for LTS on the 'buntu flavours, it is
ultimately up to the user to decide what is 'Long' and what is 'Support'.
The people behind LXLE have declared it an LTS release, quote:
" ...with plans of incremental updates until
On 05/06/13 20:07, Julien Lavergne wrote:
2013/6/5 Yorvyk :
An excellent explanation here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
Especially this part : "The LTS designation applies only to specific
subsets of the Ubuntu archive. The LTS may not apply to all flavors
and remixes of Ubuntu. For ex
On 06/06/13 04:16, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
On 06/05/2013 08:08 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Maybe raise a bug that says "you have zero supported packages" instead
of just dying?
But they won't backport the fix to Lucid :)
Actually this app is more than a little scary in its tight
Canonical-ori
al support contracts) is "supported
enough"! Ugh.
On 06/06/2013 02:56 AM, Yorvyk wrote:
I think it just needs wording a bit better.
"Community maintained packages not officially supported by Canonical"
Ok, so how would it distinguish between an old package no longer
supp
On 06/06/13 04:54, nio wiklund wrote:
What is your advice in the particular case of Lubuntu 12.04? What
should I recommend after October 2013?
For starters there isn't a particular case.
Why is the user using 12.04?
What stops them upgrading?
What do they want to do with the computer?
--
On 06/06/13 14:10, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hmm,
If I run it on 13.04 I get
phillw@piglet:~$ ubuntu-support-status
Support status summary of 'piglet':
You have 12 packages (0.8%) supported until March 2014 (9m)
You have 1330 packages (84.7%) supported until January 2014 (9m)
Y
On 07/06/13 11:01, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Dear all,
First of all, please reply ONLY with '+1' this Email to make sure you
have read it :)
*Please, do not start any discussion and if you have something to say,
reply 'me' only - don't hit reply to all, please!*
Second of all, may I remind y
On 07/06/13 12:21, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Yorvyk mailto:yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 07/06/13 11:01, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> First of all, please reply ONLY with
On 07/06/13 11:01, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Dear all,
First of all, please reply ONLY with '+1' this Email to make sure
you have read it :) *Please, do not start any discussion and if you
have something to say, reply 'me' only - don't hit reply to all,
please!*
Why do you need to know if s
On 13/06/13 13:20, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Hi,
I always prefer to think and plan ahead and I'm sure you all agree
this is a good idea. "Better safe than sorry" :)
Having that said, I'm sure you all know that we are in 2013 and Linux
Kernel starting from series 3.xx and later, started to dro
On 13/06/13 13:32, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Hi,
I'm sure we had this discussion some time before. However, IMHO,
this might be a good time to re-discuss this, if I may of course and
so sorry if this is a repeated issue.
Long story short, can we drop LightDM in favor of another lighter
Manager
On 13/06/13 23:18, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
And just for the record ... and this is a quick note as I'm just
installing right now ...
The "Browse the web" slide on the installation slide show ... MUST be
updated :)
Included software
Chromium
Supported software
Flash
Firefox
Should be update
On 14/06/13 00:36, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/+bug/1190785
It did not give me: ubiquity-slideshow-lubuntu as a listed package so it
is "ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu” ... hope I did not make a mistake!
Strange, it picks it up on
On 14/06/13 10:49, Leszek Lesner wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 11:46, schrieb Ali Linx (amjjawad):
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Yorvyk mailto:yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
On 14/06/13 00:36, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ub
On 17/06/13 01:06, Phill Whiteside wrote:
@ Jluien, if Z-Ram works so well, could we drop alternate for some of
the archs?
NO! NO! NO! and again NO!
The alternate installer is needed for those machines with unsupported
video. You can install with the Alternate and then force the VESA driver.
On 17/06/13 23:27, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Hi,
Yes, you did read it correctly. I'm really shocked.
Yesterday, I have sent my report and I was testing 13.10 but not the
latest daily build. Today, I thought to download the latest on
29 matches
Mail list logo
