Will get right on that
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi good people,
>
> as we run through cadence testing, there does seem to be a lack of
> testing. Can I ask that people do test out the DeskTop versions for lubuntu
> and xubuntu as we seem to have a gremlin in ubi
Hello everyone,
Long story short and without long introductions. I have noticed the
following behaviors on Lubuntu 13.04 (updated).
*Case I*
Screenshots from *1-6* show where Lubuntu put a new opened window *in the
middle/center of the screen**.*
*Case II*
Screenshots from *a-c* show where Lubun
Do you have a bug report # for that ubiquity bug?
I'm aware of this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1080701
It's been bugging many of us since mid-November but we obviously no longer care
about the ability to install and/or test the images until Beta falls :^(
I ha
there are things getting fixed, but not many. there doesn't seem to be
enough testing though, even just to get some bugs confirmed. some bugs in
the iso tracker have been "new" for a few months.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Lance wrote:
> Do you have a bug report # for that ubiquity bug?
>
Lance, it looks like xnox has assigned himself this bug and is working
on it. I've not run across it, but looking at the comments it seems like
a certain partition setup is needed. That said, your obviously keeping
your eye on it, which is a good thing. If your testing during the
cadence week a
Jackson, that's a good idea actually. We should pull the unconfirmed
ubiquity bugs off the lp list and try and confirm or deny them. We've
done similar drives in past cycles as the cycle gets further along. I
think now is a good time. That's something we as a team can do to help
the developers.
i might make a wiki page for iso bugs that need confirming/looking at.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Jackson, that's a good idea actually. We should pull the unconfirmed
> ubiquity bugs off the lp list and try and confirm or deny them
I'm sorry, but if we're talking about the same bug it popped up in
mid-November, now we're nearly at the end of February. That's like 3 1/2
months of not being able to properly install and test the images so it's not
inconsequential that testers would feel their testing has no impact.
It would be great to even have a list here on the QA mailing list.
When we were doing normal Alpha testing we'd sometimes have many rebuilds over
a period of 3 to 4 days but we'd typically end up with an image that was usable
by most of us, and a compilation of bugs that really needed attention.
can someone have a look at http://imgur.com/wVG3AmE and note what the
window theme is. the maximise does nothing btw. i haven't made a bug
because this should be an easy fix. the screenshot was from todays build of
lubuntu amd64
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubu
Yes, the milestones provided structure. We're missing good reporting for
our dailies, but phillw and myself have opened a bug for that. Feel free
to add to it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1126449
For now, here's a link sorted by descending date of all incomplete or
uncon
and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/IncompleteBugs for bugs that need
pushing for various things within the community
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Yes, the milestones provided structure. We're missing good reporting for
> our dailies,
12 matches
Mail list logo
