I would PERSONALLY prefer Chromium (on my machine I use Google Chrome):
mainly because it has better Flash support. Even Chromium can use
Google's Pepper-Flash, Firefox can not. But on old machines, Flash is
often an issue that doesn't work (no hardware acceleration, no SSE2, low
ram etc.)
Al
On 06/04/2013 12:10 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> +1 for Firefox
>
I also prefer Firefox, but that's purely a matter of personal preference
- not based any actual performance issues.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : ht
+1 for Firefox
On 2013-06-03 22:04, Charlie Ford wrote:
> Firefox all the way - Chromium barely runs on older hardware, doesn't
> run on powerpc, and is a huge memory hog. Folks that are wanting
> Chromium are more than capable of installing it; it's in the repos.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:
Firefox all the way - Chromium barely runs on older hardware, doesn't run
on powerpc, and is a huge memory hog. Folks that are wanting Chromium are
more than capable of installing it; it's in the repos.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:49 PM,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> And for the 'old machines'? Last thread we were talking about was making
> lubuntu-core more easily available. On these low RAM machines, which as
> Chad has stated are limited to v25 Chomium unless he can get v27 to build
> in 32 bit, I a
5 matches
Mail list logo
