Hi again Christopher,
I think you know at least as much as I about testing :-D
Anyway, you need to live too, so only if you have some time now ...
please try installing Lubuntu from an alternate iso. You would help us
perform a good beta 1 test. I think it will finish today or tomorrow.
If you
Hi Christopher,
Until you get an answer from Phill, I suggest that you download an
alternate iso and start testing it.
What kind of environment is available for you to test it?
safe end
- VirtualBox or some other virtual machine
- Dedicated test computer
- Your second computer (with a system ins
Hi Chris,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Activities/ImageTesting has an introduction
and all the links to further information. Happy testing!
Regards,
Phill.
On 3 September 2013 10:43, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
> What do you need me to do? I have been testing since Karmic Koala but I
> alway
2013/9/3 Nio Wiklund :
> The UXA tweak works in my Toshiba too,
>
> http://www.toshiba.se/laptops/satellite-pro/c850/satellite-pro-c850-19w/
>
> with Intel i5 and built-in graphics
>
> Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if
> 00[VGA controller])
>
> Would it be safe to h
The UXA tweak works in my Toshiba too,
http://www.toshiba.se/laptops/satellite-pro/c850/satellite-pro-c850-19w/
with Intel i5 and built-in graphics
Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if
00[VGA controller])
Would it be safe to have it as default, or could the UXA twe
Thank you Nik :-)
I will enter that bug number in the testing tracker.
Best regards
Nio
On 2013-09-03 12:02, Nik Th wrote:
> The bug has been already reported.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1213837
>
> Regards
> NikTh
>
> -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NikTh --
>
>
The bug has been already reported.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1213837
Regards
NikTh
-- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NikTh --
- Original Message -
From: Nio Wiklund
Sent: 09/03/13 09:35 AM
To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, Phill Whiteside, Julien Lavergne
Subject
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 00:38:51 +0100
Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Yes
>
> that was the shortest answer I could give. zsync will simply see the target
> file (on your computer), compare it to the master file (remote computer)
> and then simply update it. Zsync does not know what alpha's or beta's
> are.
Yes
that was the shortest answer I could give. zsync will simply see the target
file (on your computer), compare it to the master file (remote computer)
and then simply update it. Zsync does not know what alpha's or beta's
are... It just gets on with the job :)
So, now you have a short answer and
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 00:14:09 +0100
Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the pretty much the
> finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you want to see how
> 13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves, now is a really good
> time
Hi the release schedule is at [1].
Pre-milestone testing starts on the Monday evening (UTC) of the Thursday
when the mile stone is due for release.
Beta 2 testing starts Mon 25th March
RC testing starts Thur 18th April
Regards,
Phill.
On 14 March 2013 15:54, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 14.03.201
On 14.03.2013 17:44, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> I got my days of the week mixed up (for a change).
>
> We have at lease one beta1 avaialable for amd64, i386 and PPC
> architectures. Others do not 'make it' for beta 1, but we can now see 'gaps
> in testing' and bugs as we revert to dailies and prepar
I got my days of the week mixed up (for a change).
We have at lease one beta1 avaialable for amd64, i386 and PPC
architectures. Others do not 'make it' for beta 1, but we can now see 'gaps
in testing' and bugs as we revert to dailies and prepare for Beta 2.
Thanks,
Phill.
On 14 March 2013 15:3
Actually the release will be in 1.5 hours.
smartboyhw
2013/3/14 Phill Whiteside
> Hi Folks,
>
> we have approx 24 hours of testing left on the Beta 1 milestone [1], can
> you good people look at the gaps where testing is still needed and help out.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
> 1. http://iso.qa
Hi,
upon further investigation, the failure of the iso's being built was down
to a mis-understanding. Keeping you good testers "in the loop" has been
made more important.
Please do start testing [1]. Please do let me know if the re spins do not
carry bugs over.
Thanks,
Phill.
1. http://iso.qa.u
15 matches
Mail list logo
