Ali, those numbers only show how much compressed h264 videos are...
If you have some time and hard disk space, you can play with avconv and
convert those videos you downloaded with xvid or divx codecs. Only for test
purposes...
2013/8/2 Ali Linx (amjjawad)
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:57 AM, F
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> 2013/8/2 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) >
> > wrote:
> >> BUT ... if it is 360p and it lacks, etc then how is that my CPU is
> capable
> >> of handling 720p if it can't handle 360p nicely?
2013/8/2 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
> wrote:
>> BUT ... if it is 360p and it lacks, etc then how is that my CPU is capable
>> of handling 720p if it can't handle 360p nicely? I just don't understand
>> this.
Because when you watch it online on N
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
> Hello Federico :)
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Federico Leoni wrote:
>
>> Em 02/08/2013 13:58, "Ali Linx (amjjawad)" escreveu:
>> >
>> >
>> > My other machine has this CPU:
>> http://ark.intel.com/products/29751/Intel-Core-Duo-
Hello Federico :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> Em 02/08/2013 13:58, "Ali Linx (amjjawad)" escreveu:
> >
> >
> > My other machine has this CPU:
> http://ark.intel.com/products/29751/Intel-Core-Duo-Processor-T2350-2M-Cache-1_86-GHz-533-MHz-FSB
> >
> > So technically, Co
Em 02/08/2013 13:58, "Ali Linx (amjjawad)" escreveu:
>
>
> My other machine has this CPU:
> http://ark.intel.com/products/29751/Intel-Core-Duo-Processor-T2350-2M-Cache-1_86-GHz-533-MHz-FSB
>
> So technically, Core Due Series has NO 800MHz FSB Speed anyway :)
>
> I don't usually watch movies on my
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> > Okay, I found out that sysinfo can provide that information:
> >
> > -Processors-
> > Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.06GHz: 3066.54MHz
> > Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.06GHz: 3066.54MHz
> >
> > BogoMIPS: 6133.08
> >
> > By the
Em 02/08/2013 07:49, "Ali Linx (amjjawad)" escreveu:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > ASUS F3F with Intel Core Due @ 1.86GHz and 512MB RAM can handle that,
as far
>>> > as I remember. I don't use that machine anymore and not willing to at
the
>>>
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>
>
>
>> > ASUS F3F with Intel Core Due @ 1.86GHz and 512MB RAM can handle that,
>> as far
>> > as I remember. I don't use that machine anymore and not willing to at
>> the
>> > moment. I have watched many videos with VLC and GNOME Player,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> Today I made some encondings, and look what I found on my 13.04 x64...
>
> HD video, 1280x720:
> 1 - ffh264 + ffaac - 64,1MB
> 2 - ffodivx + ffmp3float - 335,5MB
>
> Files generated differ 423,4%.
>
> Playing on mplayer CPU usage (avarage):
Hi again,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> 2013/7/16 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
>
> > When it comes to watching videos (movies or anything else), I turn to be
> Mr.
> > Lazy who just wants to sit back, watch and enjoy, no more, no less. I put
> > all my skills and experience
Today I made some encondings, and look what I found on my 13.04 x64...
HD video, 1280x720:
1 - ffh264 + ffaac - 64,1MB
2 - ffodivx + ffmp3float - 335,5MB
Files generated differ 423,4%.
Playing on mplayer CPU usage (avarage):
1 - 27% on a Intel T7200
2 - 19,5% on a Intel T7200
2013/7/16 Federic
2013/7/16 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
> When it comes to watching videos (movies or anything else), I turn to be Mr.
> Lazy who just wants to sit back, watch and enjoy, no more, no less. I put
> all my skills and experience away, and just think about one simple fact =
> enjoy. That is why, these 'some a
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> It's too much for this P4... it's not for nothing the new i3, i5, i7
> processors has specific pieces of hardware to encode/decode this high
> compressed videos...
>
> I was curious about that, and I searched wikipedia, and checked that thi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> 2013/7/15 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
> >
> > Update:
> >
> >
> > Media (Local File /home/Videos) :
> > http://i42.tinypic.com/znmy3s.jpg
> >
> >
> > VLC (VERY bad quality - tearing and sluggish):
> > http://i40.tinypic.com/m7aq7n.jpg
> > http://
Here's a good link of tests to kill curiosity. Download videos starting
from the first and see where you can go without issues.
http://jell.yfish.us/
Em 15/07/2013 23:14, "Andre Rodovalho" escreveu:
> It's too much for this P4... it's not for nothing the new i3, i5, i7
> processors has specific p
It's too much for this P4... it's not for nothing the new i3, i5, i7
processors has specific pieces of hardware to encode/decode this high
compressed videos...
I was curious about that, and I searched wikipedia, and checked that this
p4 was released by the years of 2000 up to 2006. The first draft
2013/7/15 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blgJ-v2IkVI
>> Idle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Wmaxoo6Cpg
>>
>> I have no idea if you can tell from the video or not? I guess it is clea
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blgJ-v2IkVI
> Idle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Wmaxoo6Cpg
>
> I have no idea if you can tell from the video or not? I guess it is clear.
>
> I'm having hard time watching anything o
On 07/12/2013 10:32 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>
>
> *-pci:0
> description: PCI bridge
> product: RS480 PCI Bridge
> vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
> physical id: 1
> bus info: pci@:00:01.0
>
Em 12/07/2013 15:56, "Tracer" escreveu:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Ali Linx (amjjawad)
> > Sent: 07/12/13 09:52 PM
> > To: Leszek Lesner, Phill Whiteside
>
> > > > Say, have anyone tried to play that on Windows XP? I have no XP
> installed
> > >> > on any of my machines. Is there
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> Ali,
>
> P4 supports SSE2. Just do in a terminal
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
>
> and look under flags. :)
>
>
Yes, I sent the output earlier but the message got on hold so I had to
attach the output as a txt file :)
Indeed, there is SSE2.
> I
ght now.
>
>
>
>> Sadly we can't really do anything about it.
>> As the flashplayer was abondend for mobile plattforms and linux I also
>> really
>> don't see any future for it currently.
>>
>
> :(
>
>
> What we could do is advice us
Ali,
P4 supports SSE2. Just do in a terminal
cat /proc/cpuinfo
and look under flags. :)
I take a look to this issues with Flash several time and the unique
solution I found is an abundant computing power.
I agree 100% with Leszek: that's out of our boundary, Adobe don't like
*nix platform and s
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
> Hello Leszek,
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Leszek Lesner wrote:
>
>>
>> > THIS IS NOT GOOD :(
>> >
>> > We need to solve this issue ASAP before we carry on with our Start
>> Ubuntu
>> > campaign.
>>
>> How are we suppose to do
Hello Leszek,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Leszek Lesner wrote:
>
> > THIS IS NOT GOOD :(
> >
> > We need to solve this issue ASAP before we carry on with our Start Ubuntu
> > campaign.
>
> How are we suppose to do this ?
NO idea :D
The Adobe Flashplayer is proprietary software.
> (and
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> Yesterday I tested on my Core2Duo, a video on youtube on full screen, and
> as I told you guys before, my cooler use to accelerate a bit. I usually
> don't hear it's noise, and when I play something with flash CPU use
> increses
Hello Sensei,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have one of these... http://phillw.net/hardware/aDU4RVzY A Win7 machine
> with a decent graphic card and 4 GB of RAM. When ever I play flash movies
> in a browser, the CPU usage goes from a quiet
>
>
Your machine
Yesterday I tested on my Core2Duo, a video on youtube on full screen, and
as I told you guys before, my cooler use to accelerate a bit. I usually
don't hear it's noise, and when I play something with flash CPU use
increses...
Well, on my latest test, my CPU usage came to 107%, as my processor is d
Hi,
I have one of these... http://phillw.net/hardware/aDU4RVzY A Win7 machine
with a decent graphic card and 4 GB of RAM. When ever I play flash movies
in a browser, the CPU usage goes from a quiet
Tasks: 176 total, 1 running, 174 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
%Cpu(s): 9.5 us, 4.2 sy, 0.
@Andre:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> You might want to install:
>
> 1- browser-plugin-lightspark
> or
> 2- browser-plugin-gnash
> and...
>
> You might also want to try this with Chromium, it manages the video
> content differently...
>
I will check out these options
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> Ali, why don't you monitor the temperature to be sure the core temperature
> is anormal?
>
All the monitors [1] says: 40 C while on BIOS, it says 68 C - 70 C
> I didn't understand this:
>
> By the way, even when I opened the cover and e
Playing this locally is also a very good test to check if the issue remains
on Flash!
2013/7/12 Phill Whiteside
> Hi Ali,
>
> the free version is installed by default, you remove it when you install
> restricted extras.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
>
> On 12 July 2013 04:42, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wro
You might want to install:
1- browser-plugin-lightspark
or
2- browser-plugin-gnash
and...
You might also want to try this with Chromium, it manages the video content
differently...
2013/7/12 Ali Linx (amjjawad)
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andre Rodovalho <
> andre.rodova...@gmail.com
Hi Ali,
the free version is installed by default, you remove it when you install
restricted extras.
Regards,
Phill.
On 12 July 2013 04:42, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andre Rodovalho <
> andre.rodova...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ali, I was checking this:
>> ht
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> Ali, I was checking this:
> http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/tech-specs.html
>
> And, you don't have the minimal requirements to play with flash... (512MB
> of RAM; 128MB of graphics memory)
>
> Did you tried the the free flash plu
Ali, I was checking this:
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/tech-specs.html
And, you don't have the minimal requirements to play with flash... (512MB
of RAM; 128MB of graphics memory)
Did you tried the the free flash plugin? You might want to try and check if
you have better results...
Hi Ali,
maybe it was this posting from you I was replying to? just a thought of
what would make me reply
Off-Topic, Amigo but I will help you with an advice that you will thank me
> for :P
> Please, do not install that on your system. Saucy is still on the early
> stage. There is a chance so
Ali, why don't you monitor the temperature to be sure the core temperature
is anormal?
I didn't understand this:
By the way, even when I opened the cover and even when everything cooled
down a bit, while watching, CPU was minimum at 80%.
This is exatcly the reason for the processor to be hot, is
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> then my advice is to nag them to become html5 compliant.
>
How many websites do we have to nag? :)
I don't really think this is a good idea.
The browsers now are, do not forget apple seem to sell lots of computers
> and they
SAME old Phill, different day :)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Virtual Box?!!! A system that needs restricted extras to support USB? You
> HAVE to be joking!
>
>
What are you talking about? instead of jumping like that, read the first
email, Phill. This is Real Hardw
sorry, forgot the link...
http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/
On 12 July 2013 03:40, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> then my advice is to nag them to become html5 compliant. The browsers now
> are, do not forget apple seem to sell lots of computers and they have
> always refuse
Hi Ali,
then my advice is to nag them to become html5 compliant. The browsers now
are, do not forget apple seem to sell lots of computers and they have
always refused to support flash :) I do not see a good reason for linux to
flog itself to death in such a situation, just as I do not feel they sh
Virtual Box?!!! A system that needs restricted extras to support USB? You
HAVE to be joking!
KVM in in built to the linux kernel, using restricted extras (extensions
pack) from Oracle can cause a complete failure to boot if not configured up
correctly (and it is not only NOT F/OSS, it needs manua
Hi Phill,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Have you tried playing you Tube with HTML5 ? The opt-in area is at
> http://www.youtube.com/html5 (I use it on my Chromium install to save my
> CPU's going into overdrive).
> HTML5 WILL replace flash so get on board and give i
Have you tried playing you Tube with HTML5 ? The opt-in area is at
http://www.youtube.com/html5 (I use it on my Chromium install to save my
CPU's going into overdrive).
HTML5 WILL replace flash so get on board and give it a try.
Regards,
Phill.
On 12 July 2013 03:22, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:43 AM, fernando escutia
wrote:
> Well, i don't have this problem, i want first mention my hardware
> caracteristics, bluelight ivia-n10 netbook, processor intel atom n455, 1 gb
> ram ddr3, graphics intel gma 3150, wireless realtek rtl8191se, i tried the
> Lubuntu saucy da
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> Time to buy a new video card Ali... Buy a cheap nvidia card for less than
> 30 bucks and your PC will reborn! Hehehehe.
>
> F.
>
If you would buy me that, I will be very happy to accept your gift :P
Nuh, I will never do this. Lubuntu shou
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Andre Rodovalho
wrote:
> That heat might not be result of the software... I guess you should
> activate the temperature monitor, there is a mini-app to add on LXpanel.
>
> Even though, heat-sink hot is not normal, specially if the CPU use is on
> 100% for a long pe
Time to buy a new video card Ali... Buy a cheap nvidia card for less than
30 bucks and your PC will reborn! Hehehehe.
F.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launc
Well, i don't have this problem, i want first mention my hardware
caracteristics, bluelight ivia-n10 netbook, processor intel atom n455, 1 gb
ram ddr3, graphics intel gma 3150, wireless realtek rtl8191se, i tried the
Lubuntu saucy daily i386 iso, running on a usb, but i have a bug with the
window m
That heat might not be result of the software... I guess you should
activate the temperature monitor, there is a mini-app to add on LXpanel.
Even though, heat-sink hot is not normal, specially if the CPU use is on
100% for a long period... Check if your cooler is running good, and watch
for the CP
Well, I take that back. The issue is not yet solved :/
More headache, the machine is HOT and I can't even touch the heat-sinks. I
opened the case so that it became cooler a bit.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
> But before I increase the on board display video memory
But before I increase the on board display video memory from 32MB to 64MB,
I had problem (tearing, sluggish, etc) on that machine. The trick was just
to increase the on board memory. But for those who don't have the same
option that I do have (on BIOS), then I guess they might face the same
issue.
Ali,
tried the video of Naruto now. It's a low-res, no problem so far apart
a little tearing due to a missing vsync/nvidia on lxde but with
Compton enabled and the correct options all play fine.
Just to let you know, the video is suggish on my P3 866mhz with i830
and 24 mb Vram...
Search an hd vid
Guys, so far, I guess the problem is okay now.
I have: http://i44.tinypic.com/a4ug5s.jpg
Set it to 64MB (was 32MB) and quality seems better. Also, CPU Usage is not
80% anymore, it is between 55%-75%
I did set the memory before I read your reply, Federico so guess you are
right, I'm glad P4 can ha
Ali the P4 can handle this kind of video flows with no issues. Give more
ram to the video will help for sure but can't do miracle. If you can fins
the stream path of the video you can try to reproduce directly on vlc...
Give me the link, I would like to have a look on it.
F.
PS.: Naruto it's bett
No, after each and every Lubuntu Instalaltion, I do:
sudo apt-get install lubuntu-restricted-extras
By the way, I forgot to mention something. That machine has:
http://i44.tinypic.com/a4ug5s.jpg
I can increase the amount of memory for the video card but on the other
hand, the available RAM for t
Downloading the video is just for testing purposes... The problem is, P4
can play videos quite nice! I used less powerfull processor do it without a
problem. But Flash Videos is another matter...
Did you tried with both free and non-free flash plugin?
2013/7/10 Ali Linx (amjjawad)
> OK amigo,
OK amigo, will give that a go ;)
Thanks!
P.S.
Any kind of tweaks or something similar I can do to the machine/browser so
it would play a bit better?
P.S. 2
If P4 can't handle videos probably then, for sure, P3 or less powerful
machine can not do that, right?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM,
XBMC is a media center.
http://xbmc.org/
Should be on repos too but th latest stable version is on PPA
(ppa:team-xbmc/ppa ). Give it a try.
F.
2013/7/10 Ali Linx (amjjawad) :
> If Firefox can't handle this correctly because the CPU is not strong enough
> for nowadays videos, then I don't believ
If Firefox can't handle this correctly because the CPU is not strong enough
for nowadays videos, then I don't believe Chromium will, specially that
machine has less than 512MB RAM. Oh, and it is not about RAM - as you can
clearly see on the video I recorded for my desktop, it is not a RAM issue.
zR
Thanks for your reply, Andre,
It is not really with 'that' specific video. I do have this problem with
ANY video on ANY website I watch on that very machine. Anything is web
browser video, will have the same quality. Sluggish, Lip-Synch and bad
quality.
On my Core Due 1.86GHz Laptop with 512MB RA
Ali, I tried even with forced GPU rendering on Chrome. In this way is
a little bit better but video are not smooth like with video played
locally. Try to watch yourself a Youtube video using XBMC or other app
or download it a watch locally. You'll see the problem is we cant
handle correctly the ht
Can you download this video, and play it without browser? Try to play it
with SMplayer or VLC.
Even on my Core2Duo, flash videos use to accelerate cooler...
2013/7/10 Ali Linx (amjjawad)
> Hello Federico,
>
> So, are you saying there is no way to have a better quality on that very
> machine?
>
Hello Federico,
So, are you saying there is no way to have a better quality on that very
machine?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Federico Leoni wrote:
> For me has always been so. And I have a P4 3 ghz, a GT210 and I'm
> using Nvidia drivers. No composite manager enable. I always thought
> t
For me has always been so. And I have a P4 3 ghz, a GT210 and I'm
using Nvidia drivers. No composite manager enable. I always thought
that it was the fault of the P4 that is too "old" to manage at the
best Flash or html5... Video on XBMC, even if 1080p play fine.
F.
2013/7/10 Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Hi,
Problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blgJ-v2IkVI
Idle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Wmaxoo6Cpg
I have no idea if you can tell from the video or not? I guess it is clear.
I'm having hard time watching anything on that machine:
http://phillw.net/hardware/BnA9pw11
Any one else having t
68 matches
Mail list logo
