Re: [Lubuntu-qa] alpha 2 testing

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Phill Whiteside wrote: [snip] > ForLubuntu > Alternateamd64+mac and  > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+b > ug/1204464 It's not a critical bug as the system fully works. There is > actually the question as to if the bug of using alternate install h

[Lubuntu-qa] alpha 2 testing

Hi, as ever, darn good! Two tests left to be done... the i386 alternate iso's. If no one can do these, then I'll do them in a VM,close to dead line; but real kit is preferred. For Lubuntu Alternate amd64+mac and https://bu

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

thanks, Lance From: Nio Wiklund To: Erick Brunzell Cc: Julien Lavergne ; lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:50 AM Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing On 2013-07-23 08:16, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Jul

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 2013-07-23 09:56, Nio Wiklund wrote: > On 2013-07-23 09:38, Nio Wiklund wrote: >> On 2013-07-23 08:50, Nio Wiklund wrote: >>> On 2013-07-23 08:16, Erick Brunzell wrote: On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe >>

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 2013-07-23 09:38, Nio Wiklund wrote: > On 2013-07-23 08:50, Nio Wiklund wrote: >> On 2013-07-23 08:16, Erick Brunzell wrote: >>> On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe it's the cause. Regards, Jul

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 2013-07-23 08:50, Nio Wiklund wrote: > On 2013-07-23 08:16, Erick Brunzell wrote: >> On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: >>> Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe >>> it's the cause. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Julien Lavergne >>> >>> >> I was able to reproduce t

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 2013-07-23 08:16, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: >> Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe >> it's the cause. >> >> Regards, >> Julien Lavergne >> >> > I was able to reproduce this on a prior installation after applying > todays

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe > it's the cause. > > Regards, > Julien Lavergne > > I was able to reproduce this on a prior installation after applying todays updates: Start-Date: 2013-07-22 16:01:21 Commandline:

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe it's the cause. Regards, Julien Lavergne 2013/7/22 Nio Wiklund : > On 2013-07-22 22:07, Erick Brunzell wrote: >> On 07/22/2013 02:49 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: >>> On 07/22/2013 01:31 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: Hi, t

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 2013-07-22 22:07, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 07/22/2013 02:49 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: >> On 07/22/2013 01:31 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the lubuntu Saucy Alpha 2's have >>> arrived http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds. >>> Please help test them. If you're n

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 07/22/2013 02:49 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 07/22/2013 01:31 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the lubuntu Saucy Alpha 2's have >> arrived http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds. >> Please help test them. If you're new to testing then head over >> to https://wiki.ubu

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 07/22/2013 01:31 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi, > > the lubuntu Saucy Alpha 2's have > arrived http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds. > Please help test them. If you're new to testing then head over > to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities > The Lubuntu specific are