i can rally the troops to do the fix and i can help, too. i'll do the
entire testsuite if we can't make it happen for some reason, we'll
just add it to the release notes. considering it's the only problem
child, i don't think it will be a problem.
thanks as always, gilir ;)
wxl
On Tue, Oct 21, 2
:-(
Looks like my fix need an upload, not only a respin :-( Sorry, I was too
optimistic ...
I'll be at home late tonight, but I don't think we have enough time to fix
it properly ...
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
Le 20 oct. 2014 22:28, "∅" a écrit :
> Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Utopic Final] has been upd
On 10/21/2014 04:50 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Does the desktop *installer* have the same failure? If not, I guess it
> would be better to file against debian-installer.
The PPC Desktop installer doesn't get far enough to find that out.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/137
Does the desktop *installer* have the same failure? If not, I guess it
would be better to file against debian-installer.
@wxl
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
On Oct 21, 2014 2:38 AM, "Lars Noodén" wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 08:09 PM, ∅ wrote:
Hi Mélodie,
There is already a new i386 iso file at the qa-tracker. It is flagged
'oversized'. (I have tested all but the 'Install alongside' test-case,
and it passed my tests.)
Julien, will there be another i386 iso file, or is this the final one?
Best regards
Nio
Den 2014-10-21 13:44, me...@g
On 10/21/2014 02:44 PM, me...@gmx.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks to me some of us might be waiting for a new i386 version ready to
> test. I read
> only a PPC release will be missing as there isn't any tester for it, apart
> from that I
> can alsmost see the ones who are in the starting blocks
Hello,
It looks to me some of us might be waiting for a new i386 version ready to
test. I read
only a PPC release will be missing as there isn't any tester for it, apart from
that I
can alsmost see the ones who are in the starting blocks to get a new smaller
ISO and fill
some of the testcases.
On 10/20/2014 08:09 PM, ∅ wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> Which package should this be reported against? The 2014-10-17.1
>> Alternate image for PPC runs through the installation and appears to
>> allow creation of an encrypted LVM. However, when the installed sys
8 matches
Mail list logo
