If i get my PPC machine going i'll look at the bugs and try and be there too.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> if you are familiar with wiki editing, get on and do it! If not, give me a
> dig in the ribs and I'll do the editing. I'm concerned over not being
Installed the ppa and the package right now.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just noticed on a recent bug report. I'd like to share my reply to it
> which I sent to social media (Well, PRISM has caused some ructions).
>
> And this an announcement, not an invit
Hi,
just noticed on a recent bug report. I'd like to share my reply to it which
I sent to social media (Well, PRISM has caused some ructions).
And this an announcement, not an invite to another flame war... I've spent
> a lot of time trying to encourage chromum (not chrome) to be updated for
> th
Hi James,
if you are familiar with wiki editing, get on and do it! If not, give me a
dig in the ribs and I'll do the editing. I'm concerned over not being able
to find the 'killer' bug numbers that meant we could not have either ppc
model go forward.
thanks,
Phill.
On 19 July 2013 04:26, James
Hi,
confession time, I cannot find the email with them on :( There were, IIRC
about 3 extra show stopper bugs (the needs a reboot one had a work around,
unless that became one that could not be).
Sorry...
Phill.
On 19 July 2013 03:32, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've asked, and been give
Phill, I'll plan on being there.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've asked, and been given a list of bugs that are preventing ppc to run
> in 13.10. Could at least one person from the PPC side of testing make them
> selves available at the next IRC meeting[1]
Hi,
I've asked, and been given a list of bugs that are preventing ppc to run in
13.10. Could at least one person from the PPC side of testing make them
selves available at the next IRC meeting[1] so that Julien can get an idea
of the issues (I'll also invite at least one person from the -release t
Hello Leszek,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:03 AM, wrote:
> I don't get your Problem Ali
I'm deeply sorry, looks like I made it look like as a problem rather than a
call for help/support.
I do have no problems, trust me. I was just trying to gather a summary or
feedback so I listed few Qs and thou
I don't get your Problem Ali.
I thought you tested out zram and I explained how it technicaly worked. If the
unamed Community you are working together with still does not see the benefit
then they maybe don't know what you are talking about and simply don't
understand the technical background.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> as your motto staes, all of us are smarter than one. If any team from any
> linux distro finds Z-RAM to be useful - it is for them to test and then add
> it if it proves useful. Just the same as it is for, say, each distro to
Hello Ali,
please see inline quotes.
On Jul 18, 2013 9:25 PM, "Ali Linx (amjjawad)" wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Ho Wan Chan
wrote:
>>
>> Hello Ali (et. al),
>
> Hi
>
>>
>> I think you need to understand something.
>>
>> 1. You shouldn't base zRAM results on Lubuntu. You shoul
Hi Ali,
as your motto staes, all of us are smarter than one. If any team from any
linux distro finds Z-RAM to be useful - it is for them to test and then add
it if it proves useful. Just the same as it is for, say, each distro to
choose their default browser :) I hope that puts your mind at rest,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> z-RAM is a part of lubuntu desktop, it has been found to be useful and
> will continue to be a part of lubuntu until such time as its usefulness is
> gone (i.e. goes unsupported / has a major bug).
>
Hi Phill,
As you are the wis
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
> Hello Ali (et. al),
>
Hi
> I think you need to understand something.
>
> 1. You shouldn't base zRAM results on Lubuntu. You should base results on
> the flavour that the community mentioned has created.
>
> 2. The community you mentioned is
Hi,
z-RAM is a part of lubuntu desktop, it has been found to be useful and will
continue to be a part of lubuntu until such time as its usefulness is gone
(i.e. goes unsupported / has a major bug). As to it getting into the
alternate for a try out before feature-freeze; that is for the devs to
dec
Hello Ali (et. al),
I think you need to understand something.
1. You shouldn't base zRAM results on Lubuntu. You should base results on
the flavour that the community mentioned has created.
2. The community you mentioned is rather conservative. They don't like to
add things without detailed plan
16 matches
Mail list logo
