Your assumed answers are correct except for the last one. Greg will
have to confirm, but here the yaboot command is not required once the
system is installed. It is only required when booting from the live CD.
Ron Mitchell
Sent from my iPod
On 2012-10-17, at 9:32 PM, ∅ wrote:
i organized
i organized this and trimmed this down to just the necessary bit. i left the
rest of it commented out so if our fearless editor karl wants to put it back
in, he can. however, my feeling is that the installation part of the wiki
(elsewhere) should discuss the various ways to burn an iso and the g
Couldn't have said it any better my friend.
Ron M.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:43:41 -0600
Greg Faith wrote:
> Ok I am not a wiki dude..
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ/PPC#preview
>
> Greg nm_geo
--
Ron Mitchell
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubun
Ok I am not a wiki dude..
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ/PPC#preview
Greg nm_geo
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/L
Hey I know this isn't necessarily a Lubuntu thing but there is a lot to
testing Ubuntu server. The tests are easy but there are fifteen of them
[1]. I've done five and am taking a break but when I return I'm going to
finish the sixth. So if anyone can help that would be great.
wxl
[1] http://iso.
yes sir he helped mucho!! and Ron found time to get some of mine done..
We R Good Together..
Greg
And we do have a good cause. Long Live Lubuntu
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Lance wrote:
> I see Julien has knocked out most of what I was going to do ;^)
>
> I love this team, Lubuntu rocks!
>
I see Julien has knocked out most of what I was going to do ;^)
I love this team, Lubuntu rocks!
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
I went ahead and installed Precise Lubuntu amd64 on a spare partition on my
HTPC because I know 32 bit Lubuntu runs fine on it anyway. I've since updated
it and the dist-upgrade is now running via: update-manager -d -c ..
so keep your fingers crossed, hopefully I'll have the Lubuntu
On a Samsung 535 u3c notebook (kind of ultrabook ;) ) i notice this
problems with 12.10
Suspend to ram is impossibile to re-awake
Suspend to disk reawakes but with wireless spent. The netowrk icon
says "Wireless disabled hardwarewise" (like always: translating from
german here)
After that any kin
this is one of the reasons why i suggested all of us ppc folks should have our
hardware profiles up somewhere where we can all see them. i think we often have
problems where others don't because of some small difference in our hardware.
but we have no way to do any comparative testing when the d
I'm on a Samsung 535 u3c (amd 64) and i reported some time ago that
there were problems with (=sleep) and (=hibernate).
Suspend to ram is impossible to wake up. Suspend to disks turns back,
but with wireless disabled.
2012/10/18 Greg Faith :
>
>
> Excellent I will attack the ppc desktops with m
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:20:07 -0600
Greg Faith wrote:
> Excellent I will attack the ppc desktops with my radeon G4 and fill in
> holes on the amd64 and i386 until my eyes close.
excellent! make sure if you get it to work through some workaround, update the
faq page like i did with nVidia [1].
w
Excellent I will attack the ppc desktops with my radeon G4 and fill in
holes on the amd64 and i386 until my eyes close.
Greg nm_geo
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https:/
HI Lance,
if no one does it over night, I have a PP AMD64 iso, so I can run it in VM
tomorrow.
Regards,
Phill.
On 17 October 2012 22:56, Lance wrote:
> Just thought to add:
>
> I may not have time to do the amd64 PP -> QQ upgrade test though. It'll be
> a back burner issue for me ;^(
>
> Lanc
I have only one PC that I can test amd64 on so I'll update all of my images and
finish testing the i386 alternate images on my old VIA C7 box while I'm testing
the amd64 live images on my Intel box. Then I'll hit the amd64 alternate images
on the Intel box.
I should be able to pull that off,
L
Just thought to add:
I may not have time to do the amd64 PP -> QQ upgrade test though. It'll be a
back burner issue for me ;^(
Lance
PS, it's purely a time availability issue.
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Lance wrote:
From: Lance
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC
To: "UH" , "Greg Faith"
Cc: lubuntu-q
Thanks Lance !
Phill.
On 17 October 2012 22:51, Lance wrote:
> I'm just finishing up with i386 and unless something horrible happens I
> can jump on the amd64 images soon.
>
> Lance
>
> --- On *Wed, 10/17/12, Greg Faith * wrote:
>
>
> From: Greg Faith
> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC
> To: "UH"
Hi Greg,
with all the respins, the table looks a bit barren. ppc-alternate can go
through with the release note. Walter cannot get Desktop-ppc to work at
all. By all means have a dabble with desktop, but don't beat yourself up.
Assuming Walter gets the server-ppc one to do the base installs, I'll
I'm just finishing up with i386 and unless something horrible happens I can
jump on the amd64 images soon.
Lance
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Greg Faith wrote:
From: Greg Faith
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC
To: "UH"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 4:46 PM
Phil
Phill,
Are we satisfied with the amd64 and i386 isos or do I need to concentrate
on them or ppc. I can do two at once but three is a bit much for testing
simultaneously. I plan on doing what I can tonight but with the respins and
all HELP LOL..
Greg nm_geo
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net
Oh, btw, i noticed i had, after the broken installation process a
german mac keyboard but without any 3rd level chooser (so it was
arkwarded to find the at- sign - i had to copy it . . . ;) ). And i
think this will create a problem for all not english/american Mac
users even after a successfull ins
For me, with G4 PB 17" radeon today the installation did not pass like
it did not pass several days ago. I filed a bug report with the number
#1067899 - I did what i could, sorry for being so ingenuous . ..
2012/10/17 Phill Whiteside :
> Hi guys,
>
> As so far attempts to install Desktop-ppc seem
Following Walter's instructions i filed a bug report which has the
number #1067899
The installation process for me hangs also with the today daily built.
Hardware is:
PB G4, 17" 1, 3 Ghz, 2003, 2 gig mem, 80 gig internal hd.
2012/10/15 UH :
> My installation hangs at "Recognizing hardware, pleas
Hi guys,
As so far attempts to install Desktop-ppc seem to fail with nVidia, could
someone with Radeon chipset please test. If it passes with Radeon, we can
pass it & include a release note.
Regards,
Phill.
--
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
P
Hi Lars,
I'm sorry to have to ask As you may have noticed there have been
multiple respins, would you be so kind as to re-do the AMD64-MAC ones.
@ All, It is in the lap of the Gods now. The release team, I assure you,
have reacted as quickly as possible to issues. I know that they share your
Le 10/17/2012 09:38 PM, ∅ a écrit :
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:54:42 +0200
> Julien Lavergne wrote:
>
>> Le 10/16/2012 11:26 PM, Phill Whiteside a écrit :
>>> What is required is an honest 'pass' for the ppc versions, even with a
>>> grey bug. If at least one of the video cards can be gotten to pass
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:54:42 +0200
Julien Lavergne wrote:
> Le 10/16/2012 11:26 PM, Phill Whiteside a écrit :
> > What is required is an honest 'pass' for the ppc versions, even with a
> > grey bug. If at least one of the video cards can be gotten to pass,
> > then a release can be made and cont
Le 10/16/2012 11:26 PM, Phill Whiteside a écrit :
> Well, it's been a rather roller-coaster ride.
>
> The final (unless something REALLY goes wrong tomorrow) re-spin of the
> world (all isos, everywhere) is now just starting.
>
> What is in no doubt is that from A3 onwards, things got worse. It
Both are fairly self explanatory:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1067184
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1067836
My memory isn't what it used to be but I'd have sworn that adding the "-c"
suffix while upgrading should display the appr
Unfortunately guys, it looks like my day will be taken up with
priorities away from the computer, things that can't be put aside.
Won't get to my testing until thin evening. I am GMT - 7, so that will
probably be too late to be of any use.
Ron Mitchell
Sent from my iPod
On 2012-10-17, at
They found that just as I was going to bed. There is a respin of the world
due to commence at 13:03 UTC, it will be a couple of hours to complete.
Regards,
Phill.
On 17 October 2012 03:44, Greg Faith wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1067566
>
> And things were g
The problem came when i noticed, that Ubuntu One
(=ubuntuone-controlpanel) always calls Chromium instead of Firefox
that i sat to standardbrowser in Desktop Preferences. Now, i suspect
there might be some deeper setting which overrules my settings as for
example that, that Chromium is the standard
32 matches
Mail list logo
