Re: [Lubuntu-comms] [10.04] - To Be or Not To Be - deep digging and testing

2013-05-03 Thread Arpad Barta
I could not agree more. Many things have to be carefully considered before we do anything. 1. The OS (I use the expression OS because in this way I can cover any kind of Ubuntu flavors or it`s derivatives) that we want to use as our primary solution for the "XP" problem needs to be part of the L

Re: [Lubuntu-comms] [10.04] - To Be or Not To Be - deep digging and testing

2013-05-03 Thread Ali Linx (amjjawad)
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > > On 05/02/2013 12:53 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > > > I'm now typing this email from Lubuntu 10.04: > > > Okay, we all know that Lubuntu 10.04 wasn't LTS. > > > Is this a secure system? is this an LTS system? what are the risks of > >

Re: [Lubuntu-comms] [10.04] - To Be or Not To Be - deep digging and testing

2013-05-03 Thread Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Hello Arpad, I think you are talking about this:) My email about Lubuntu 10.04 has nothing to do with my campaign about Windows XP :D It is true that Lubuntu would be our strongest tools in this huge project but after rena

Re: [Lubuntu-comms] [10.04] - To Be or Not To Be - deep digging and testing

2013-05-03 Thread Nio Wiklund
On 2013-05-03 06:17, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 05/02/2013 12:53 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > >> I'm now typing this email from Lubuntu 10.04: > >> Okay, we all know that Lubuntu 10.04 wasn't LTS. > >> Is this a secure system? is this an LTS system? what are the risks of >> running this? >