Hi,
I find sometimes there are some tracepoints not exist in metadata file(but
they are in the list of lttng list -u) and the end result is they can NOT be
logged. I can not always reproduce it. It bothered me for 2 days.
The lttng version is 2.7, I know it is not the latest version but t
I'd like to add that both "lttng list -u" and "lttng list $session_name" can
get those tracepoints' names...
--------------
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2020年7月1日(星期三) 11:05
收件人:lttng-dev ; mathieu.de
.
--
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2020年7月1日(星期三) 11:44
收件人:lttng-dev ; mathieu.desnoyers
主 题:[lttng-dev] 回复: some tracepoints not exist in metadata?
I'd like to add that both "lttng list -u" and "lttng list $session_name" can
get
g list $session_name" can
get those tracepoints' names...
--------------
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2020年7月1日(星期三) 11:05
收件人:lttng-dev ; mathieu.desnoyers
主 题:[lttng-dev] some tracepoints not exist in metadata?
Hi,
I find sometimes there are some tracepoints not exist in meta
Hi,
I know lttng-ust tracepoint process uses per cpu lockless ringbuffer
algorithm for high performance so that it relies on getcpu() to return the cpu
number on which the app is running.
Unfortunately, I am working on arm that linux kernel does not support vdso
getcpu() implemention and
Hi, Lttng-dev:
I found a strange problem related to lttng-consumed and ctf files recently.
The ctf files belongs to some CPUs have been stopped rotating but other ctf
files(belong to other CPUs) keeped working as usual. I am very sure all CPUs
were producing spans all the time.
#date; ls -lt
Hi, Desnoyers
For various reasons, none of the three suggestions you mentioned about
reproducing the problem can be achieved easily.
I am also wonder why commit counter not updated...It seems that the span
producers not complete commiting(be killed?hang?)? It‘s very hard to debug a
>No, it's not that simple
Can I update that sub-buffer commit_cold counter(how about hot one?) to the
"right" value then skip consuming this sub-buffer(but update the consume
counter as if I have consumed the sub-buffer)?
It seems the tracing progress will continue with the cost of missing all t
Hi,
There are many items such as "/dev/shm/ust-shm-consumer-81132 (deleted)"
exist in lttng-sessiond fd spaces. I know it is the result of shm_open() and
shm_unlnik() in create_posix_shm().
However, today, I found these items also exist in a traced application which
is a long-time runnin
>"I found these items also exist in a traced application which is a long-time
>running daemon"
Even if lttng-sessiond has been killed!!
Thanks
zhenyu.ren
------
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2022年2月23日(星期三) 22:44
without killling ust applications(I tried to
dig into kernel shm_open and /dev/shm, but not found any ideas)?
Thanks in advance
zhenyu.ren
----------
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2022年2月23日(星期三) 23:09
收件人:lttng-dev
主 题:[lttng-dev] 回复
-guidelines
Cheers
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 12:47:34PM +0800, zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev wrote:
> Hi, lttng-dev team
>When lttng-sessiond exits, the ust applications should call
> lttng_ust_objd_table_owner_cleanup() and clean up all shm resource(unmap and
> close). Howerver I do f
ation?
>> Hi zhenyu.ren,
>> Please open a bug on our bug tracker and provide a reproducer against the
>> latest
>> stable version (2.13.x).
>> https://bugs.lttng.org/
>> Please follow the guidelines:
>> https://bugs.lttng.org/#Bug-reporting-guidelines
on our bug tracker and provide a reproducer against the
>> latest
>> stable version (2.13.x).
>> https://bugs.lttng.org/
>> Please follow the guidelines:
>> https://bugs.lttng.org/#Bug-reporting-guidelines
>> Cheers
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 12:47:34
Oh, I see. I have an old ust(2.7). So I have no FD_CLOEXEC in
ustcomm_recv_fds_unix_sock().
Thanks very much!!!
zhenyu.ren
--
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2022年3月10日(星期四) 11:24
收件人:Mathieu Desnoyers
抄 送:lttng-dev
主 题:[lttng
--
发件人:zhenyu.ren via lttng-dev
发送时间:2022年3月10日(星期四) 11:24
收件人:Mathieu Desnoyers
抄 送:lttng-dev
主 题:[lttng-dev] 回复:回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: shm leak in traced application?
>When this happpens, is the process holding a single (or very few)
16 matches
Mail list logo