Re: [lttng-dev] Statically linking LTTng to an application built with MUSL toolchain

Bumping. Appreciate your comments on this Yehuda Hello, I've built the urcu, lttng-ust and lttng-tools with the musl toolchain, and upon statically linking the application with the lttng-ust archive (just as documented here: https://lttng.org/docs/v2.13/#doc-building-tracepoint-providers

[lttng-dev] Using lttng 2.11 and UST doesn't appear to work - getting empty trace files

It might be related to the static linking of lttng-ust https://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2018-January/027705.html I also went down that path just to figure it’s not supported. Perhaps lttng documentation should be updated to make a clear note static linking is not supported (or maybe I

[lttng-dev] delay between trigger and action

Hi everyone I am experimenting with enabling trace for a specific iteration of a loop in my application. I created 2 trace points at the start and end of the loop which log the iteration number. the loop itself creates thousands of trace points. It runs for ~5ms. on lttng side I created 2 trigg

Re: [lttng-dev] Profiling LTTng tracepoint latency on different arm platforms

> On 6/20/23 10:20, Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev wrote: > > On 6/20/23 06:27, Mousa, Anas via lttng-dev wrote: > >> Hello, > > > >> > >> > Arethereanysuggestionstorootcausethehighlatencyandpotentiallyimproveito > n*platform1*? > >> > >> Thanks and best regards, > >> > >> Anas. > >> > > > > I

Re: [lttng-dev] Profiling LTTng tracepoint latency on different arm platforms

> On 6/21/23 01:39, Yitschak, Yehuda wrote: > >> On 6/20/23 10:20, Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev wrote: > >>> On 6/20/23 06:27, Mousa, Anas via lttng-dev wrote: > Hello, > >>> > > > >> > Arethereanysuggestionstorootcausethehighlatencyandpotentiallyimprovei > >> to > >> n*platform