Re: Memory Consumption High After Upgrading to 2.13 from 2.10

2025-03-11 Thread Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev
Hi Lakshya, what is the output of the following commands on both systems: * nproc (32, I assume) * cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible also, when you are running instrumented applications which user(s) are you running applications as? thanks, kienan On 3/11/25 6:35 AM, Gour DEV via lttng-d

Re:Re: need help for avoiding system calls while using URCU (Userspace RCU)

2025-03-11 Thread 方锴 via lttng-dev
dear kienanThank you for your guidance, I've found DKDP's URCU successfully avoids system calls. Grateful for your support!Best regards,fangkai At 2025-03-07 00:17:34, "Kienan Stewart" wrote: >Hi 方锴, > >On 3/4/25 3:09 AM, 方锴 via lttng-dev wrote: > >> I have referenced your project, URCU (Userspa

Re: Github Action Runners creating world-writable shared memory section: lttng-ust-wait-n

2025-03-11 Thread Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev
Hi Bill, I don't have the context about gha-runner to answer regarding their use of LTTng. I can however, give a bit of context about how the those shared memory allocations are used within the scope of LTTng. These shared memory sections are used for presence/absence notifications between

Memory Consumption High After Upgrading to 2.13 from 2.10

2025-03-11 Thread Gour DEV via lttng-dev
Hello, I have recently upgraded from lttng 2.10 to 2.13 as part of servers migration from buster to bookworm. lttng 2.10.6 - KeKriek to lttng 2.13.9 - Nordicité I see an increase in memory consumption upto 11Gig after my recent upgrade. In buster root@localhost:~# top -b -n 1 | grep lttng PID

Re: Memory Consumption High After Upgrading to 2.13 from 2.10

2025-03-11 Thread Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev
Hi Lakshya, what is the output of the following commands on both systems: * nproc (32, I assume) * cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible On 3/10/25 10:02 AM, Gour DEV via lttng-dev wrote: Hello, I have recently upgraded from lttng 2.10 to 2.13 as part of servers migration from buster to bookwo

Re: Memory Consumption High After Upgrading to 2.13 from 2.10

2025-03-11 Thread Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev
Hi Lakshya, On 3/11/25 12:25 PM, Gour DEV wrote: > Hi, Kienan > > here is the requested output > > root@localhost:~# top -b -n 1 | grep lttng > 4841 root 20 0 11.5g 11.0g 11.0g S 5.9 35.4 8:39.93 > lttng-c+ > 4824 root 20 0 1098824 26456 5380 S 0.0 0.1 0:0

Github Action Runners creating world-writable shared memory section: lttng-ust-wait-n

2025-03-11 Thread bill robertson via lttng-dev
GHA runners appear to use lttng-ust for some sort of IPC between runners on the same machine. $ ll /dev/shm/ -rw-rw-rw- 1 gha-runner-7 gha-runner-7 4096 Feb 20 04:03 lttng-ust-wait-8 -rw-r- 1 gha-runner-8 gha-runner-8 4096 Feb 20 04:03 lttng-ust-wait-8-558 -rw-r- 1 gha-runner-7 gha-runn

Memory Consumption High After Upgrading to 2.13 from 2.10

2025-03-11 Thread Gour DEV via lttng-dev
Hello, I have recently upgraded from lttng 2.10 to 2.13 as part of servers migration from buster to bookworm. lttng 2.10.6 - KeKriek to lttng 2.13.9 - Nordicité I see an increase in memory consumption upto 11Gig after my recent upgrade. In buster root@localhost:~# top -b -n 1 | grep lttng PID

Re:Re: need help for avoiding system calls while using URCU (Userspace RCU)

2025-03-11 Thread 方锴 via lttng-dev
dear Mathieu Thank you for your guidance, I've found DKDP's URCU successfully avoids system calls. Grateful for your support!Best regards,fangkai At 2025-03-07 00:58:21, "Mathieu Desnoyers" wrote: >On 2025-03-06 11:17, Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev wrote: >> Hi 方锴, >> >> On 3/4/25 3:09 AM, 方锴