Hi Lakshya,
what is the output of the following commands on both systems:
* nproc (32, I assume)
* cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible
also, when you are running instrumented applications which user(s) are
you running applications as?
thanks,
kienan
On 3/11/25 6:35 AM, Gour DEV via lttng-d
dear kienanThank you for your guidance, I've found DKDP's URCU
successfully avoids system calls. Grateful for your support!Best
regards,fangkai
At 2025-03-07 00:17:34, "Kienan Stewart" wrote:
>Hi 方锴,
>
>On 3/4/25 3:09 AM, 方锴 via lttng-dev wrote:
>
>> I have referenced your project, URCU (Userspa
Hi Bill,
I don't have the context about gha-runner to answer regarding their use
of LTTng.
I can however, give a bit of context about how the those shared memory
allocations are used within the scope of LTTng.
These shared memory sections are used for presence/absence notifications
between
Hello,
I have recently upgraded from lttng 2.10 to 2.13 as part of servers
migration from buster to bookworm.
lttng 2.10.6 - KeKriek to lttng 2.13.9 - Nordicité
I see an increase in memory consumption upto 11Gig after my recent upgrade.
In buster
root@localhost:~# top -b -n 1 | grep lttng
PID
Hi Lakshya,
what is the output of the following commands on both systems:
* nproc (32, I assume)
* cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible
On 3/10/25 10:02 AM, Gour DEV via lttng-dev wrote:
Hello,
I have recently upgraded from lttng 2.10 to 2.13 as part of servers
migration from buster to bookwo
Hi Lakshya,
On 3/11/25 12:25 PM, Gour DEV wrote:
> Hi, Kienan
>
> here is the requested output
>
> root@localhost:~# top -b -n 1 | grep lttng
> 4841 root 20 0 11.5g 11.0g 11.0g S 5.9 35.4 8:39.93
> lttng-c+
> 4824 root 20 0 1098824 26456 5380 S 0.0 0.1 0:0
GHA runners appear to use lttng-ust for some sort of IPC between runners on
the same machine.
$ ll /dev/shm/
-rw-rw-rw- 1 gha-runner-7 gha-runner-7 4096 Feb 20 04:03 lttng-ust-wait-8
-rw-r- 1 gha-runner-8 gha-runner-8 4096 Feb 20 04:03 lttng-ust-wait-8-558
-rw-r- 1 gha-runner-7 gha-runn
Hello,
I have recently upgraded from lttng 2.10 to 2.13 as part of servers
migration from buster to bookworm.
lttng 2.10.6 - KeKriek to lttng 2.13.9 - Nordicité
I see an increase in memory consumption upto 11Gig after my recent upgrade.
In buster
root@localhost:~# top -b -n 1 | grep lttng
PID
dear Mathieu Thank you for your guidance, I've found DKDP's URCU
successfully avoids system calls. Grateful for your support!Best
regards,fangkai
At 2025-03-07 00:58:21, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
wrote:
>On 2025-03-06 11:17, Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev wrote:
>> Hi 方锴,
>>
>> On 3/4/25 3:09 AM, 方锴