- On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03 +0800, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
>> > From: He Zhe
>> >
>> > For the moment,
>> > 0001~0004 are on master branch only.
>> > 000
- On Jun 12, 2019, at 1:10 PM, zhe he zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
> On 6/12/19 6:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03 +080
- On Jun 12, 2019, at 3:27 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:58:22AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>...
>> We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back
>> into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we wi
On 6/12/19 6:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03 +0800, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
From: He Zhe
For the moment
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:58:22AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>...
> We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back
> into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will
> release a 2.10.x version including support for it in lttng-modules.
>.
Hi,
> > Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this.
> >
> > We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back
> > into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will
> > release a 2.10.x version including support for it
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this.
> > >
> > > We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back
> > > into our current stable release. So as soon
On 6/12/19 7:29 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Jun 12, 2019, at 1:10 PM, zhe he zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
>
>> On 6/12/19 6:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Rich
Hello,
I'm trying to read the file "metadata".
I read the struct:
struct metadata_packet_header {
uint32_t magic; /* 0x75D11D57 */
uint8_t uuid[16]; /* Unique Universal Identifier */
uint32_t checksum; /* 0 if unused */
uint32_t content_size; /* in bits */
uint32_t packet_size; /* in bits */
uin
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:22 PM Zvi Vered wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to read the file "metadata".
> I read the struct:
>
> struct metadata_packet_header {
> uint32_t magic; /* 0x75D11D57 */
> uint8_t uuid[16]; /* Unique Universal Identifier */
> uint32_t checksum; /* 0 if unused */
> uint3
10 matches
Mail list logo
