Adding new events / streams to an existing trace?

2025-07-22 Thread Alec Rivers via lttng-dev
Hello, I am trying to process an LTTng trace using babeltrace2's Python API. What I want to do is add a new stream of events to an existing trace. My approach is to create a custom source component that reads the existing trace and forwards existing messages unchanged, but adds (interleaves, in fa

[RELEASE] Babeltrace 2.0.7 - Amqui

2025-07-22 Thread Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
Hi everyone! Today marks the release of Babeltrace 2.0.7, coinciding with "National Hammock Day" – the perfect excuse to kick back and relax while this new release builds. What's new since Babeltrace 2.0.6? == Below is the full list of changes in this update: 202

[RELEASE] Babeltrace 2.1.2 - Brossard

2025-07-22 Thread Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
Hi everyone! Today marks the release of Babeltrace 2.1.2, coinciding with "National Hammock Day" – the perfect excuse to kick back and relax while this new release builds. What's new since Babeltrace 2.1.1? == Below is the full list of changes in this update: 202

Re: Integrating QSBR with libuv

2025-07-22 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
On 2025-07-16 00:09, Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev wrote: Hi, currently, the BIND 9 design involves multiple threads with per-thread event loop from libuv (uv_loop). We are using the default rcu variant, but it seems like an ideal place to switch to QSBR as we can call quiescent state periodical

Re: tests/regression/tools/clear/test_ust fails occacionally

2025-07-22 Thread Kienan Stewart via lttng-dev
Hi Mingli, sorry I missed these messages last week. What version of babeltrace are you using when running the tests? What distribution + version are you using? There is a fix for hangs that may occur during the test, which is included in stable-2.14 - https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/com