Hello,
I am trying to process an LTTng trace using babeltrace2's Python API. What
I want to do is add a new stream of events to an existing trace. My
approach is to create a custom source component that reads the existing
trace and forwards existing messages unchanged, but adds (interleaves, in
fa
Hi everyone!
Today marks the release of Babeltrace 2.0.7, coinciding with
"National Hammock Day" – the perfect excuse to kick back and relax while
this new release builds.
What's new since Babeltrace 2.0.6?
==
Below is the full list of changes in this update:
202
Hi everyone!
Today marks the release of Babeltrace 2.1.2, coinciding with
"National Hammock Day" – the perfect excuse to kick back and relax while
this new release builds.
What's new since Babeltrace 2.1.1?
==
Below is the full list of changes in this update:
202
On 2025-07-16 00:09, Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev wrote:
Hi,
currently, the BIND 9 design involves multiple threads with per-thread
event loop from libuv (uv_loop).
We are using the default rcu variant, but it seems like an ideal place
to switch to QSBR as we can call quiescent state periodical
Hi Mingli,
sorry I missed these messages last week.
What version of babeltrace are you using when running the tests?
What distribution + version are you using?
There is a fix for hangs that may occur during the test, which is
included in stable-2.14 -
https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/com