On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 08:08, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > A little bit related question/problem - some of our system test jobs got
> > significantly slower (3x-5x) with **clang-16** TSAN after we integrated
> > liburcu to BIND 9. The GCC (13.1.1) TSAN doesn’t exhibit this behavior.
> >
> > The libu
On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 07:33, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> A little bit related question/problem - some of our system test jobs got
> significantly slower (3x-5x) with **clang-16** TSAN after we integrated
> liburcu to BIND 9. The GCC (13.1.1) TSAN doesn’t exhibit this behavior.
>
> The liburcu integr
A little bit related question/problem - some of our system test jobs got
significantly slower (3x-5x) with **clang-16** TSAN after we integrated liburcu
to BIND 9. The GCC (13.1.1) TSAN doesn’t exhibit this behavior.
The liburcu integration in BIND 9 is very light at the moment - we use liburcu
