I see no problems. -T
On Jan 22, 2025 at 7:12:23 PM, David Dong via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: lsr WG),
>
> As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
> registration in draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33 for us?
I see no problems. -T
On Jan 22, 2025 at 7:02:03 PM, David Dong via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: lsr WG),
>
> As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
> registration in draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-23 for us?
(also posted at https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/iesg/appeals/artifact/127)
Hi Aijun!
# Summary
On November 6, 2024, Aijun Wang appealed the conclusion of the Working Group
Last Call (WGLC) of draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv, a document of the Link State
Routing (LSR) working group. The appeal cla
I have reviewed the draft and support moving ahead with publishing this as an
RFC.
The primary use case is well described in Section 3 of the draft. Note this is
NOT, as some folks have mistakenly inferred from the draft title, aimed at
multicast RPF use cases.
As regards the evolving set of
Hi, Roman:
Thanks for your responses.
But, it is only repeat of previous procedures analysis from our AD, not my
expected independent technical analysis/responses, even I illustrated my
technical arguments for your references:
> here I want the experts within IESG to review it independently, r
