[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

2019-07-15 Thread Stefan Santesson via Datatracker
Reviewer: Stefan Santesson Review result: Has Nits This document seems to have a reasonable security considerations section. As a nit, I notice that the abbreviation OSPF is not written out or explained at all in this document. One should hope that most people that find their way to this document

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

2019-07-15 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Stefan, On 7/15/19, 5:51 AM, "Stefan Santesson via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Stefan Santesson Review result: Has Nits This document seems to have a reasonable security considerations section. As a nit, I notice that the abbreviation OSPF is not written out or

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

2019-07-15 Thread Stefan Santesson
Thanks for clarifying that. I just noticed that V2 of OSPF had its abbreviation written out, but not V3 I stand corrected then :) Stefan Santesson On 2019-07-15, 13:12, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: Hi Stefan, On 7/15/19, 5:51 AM, "Stefan Santesson via Datatracker" wrote: