On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:33 AM, wu zhangjin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
>> Roman Mamedov wrote:
>>
>>> So I have now built my own 2.6.38 kernel with the MFGPT clocksource,
>>> and it seems to be stable and not lockin
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
> Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
>> So I have now built my own 2.6.38 kernel with the MFGPT clocksource,
>> and it seems to be stable and not locking up. MFGPT was blamed to slow
>> down system clock by 12 se
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> So I have now built my own 2.6.38 kernel with the MFGPT clocksource,
> and it seems to be stable and not locking up. MFGPT was blamed to slow
> down system clock by 12 seconds in an hour, but I currently do not
> observe this (runnin
Hello!
Has anyone seen Yeeloong lock-up when using cpufreq on recent kernels?
I tried kernels 2.6.37 and 2.6.38 from both anheng.com.cn and linux-
libre, and on those kernels enabling cpufreq governors ondemand or
conservative makes my Yeeloong lock up pretty quickly (in 5-10
minutes, though some
