As long as I know, my Loco-Team is an approved-one but it`s listed as
non-approved. How can I know if it is or not?
Thanks,
Kemel Zaidan aka Legendario
2009/12/11 Daniel Holbach
> Hello everybody,
>
> after hours of work of lots of nice people, we're happy to announce
>
>http://loco.ubunt
same here,
we are approved since 2005
Jan
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Legendario wrote:
> As long as I know, my Loco-Team is an approved-one but it`s listed as
> non-approved. How can I know if it is or not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kemel Zaidan aka Legendario
>
>
> 2009/12/11 Daniel Holbach
>
> H
Another great thing to see would be all of the teams on an interactive map
I filed a bug for this last year https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/253545
Looks like it's being worked on already!
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-locomap/+spec/finish-locomap-6.x
On Fri, Dec 11, 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ya, we're working on this but there's a lot going on that's been
keeping it from happening. Hopefully with the static XML being output
and some time to finish developing specs and some eager developers we
can really get this moving.
There are new tech
well i tried to add everyone to the approved teams but the respective
admins had to accept the invitation. Some Teams are just acepting the
invitations now. if you didn't get an invitation please email the loco
council and we will sort this out.
loco-council _AT_ lists _DOT_ubuntu _DOT_ com
On Mo
thanks,
I think the main problem here is communication, since
I cannot find any relevant guidelines to these changes
on the wiki. If someone write something relevant we could follow that and
don't need to brag about it :)
Jan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Efrain Valles wrote:
> well i trie
I will see that this is included in the wiki, good point. On the other
hand, what bragging are you reffering to?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Jan Husar wrote:
> thanks,
>
> I think the main problem here is communication, since
> I cannot find any relevant guidelines to these changes
> on the
mine bragging :)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Efrain Valles wrote:
> I will see that this is included in the wiki, good point. On the other
> hand, what bragging are you reffering to?
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Jan Husar wrote:
> > thanks,
> >
> > I think the main problem here is c
