Re: [llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: nested function support (w/o trampolines)

2007-02-07 Thread Chris Lattner
On Feb 5, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > This patch adds support for nested subroutines, but not for > trampolines (used for taking pointers to nested subroutines; > implementing support for trampolines is more tricky since it > needs help from the code generators). There are no changes

Re: [llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: nested function support (w/o trampolines)

2007-02-06 Thread Reid Spencer
Hi Duncan, On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:18 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > A better testcase. This doesn't mean it's good, just better :) > The gcc testsuite contains more comprehensive tests. I thought > of importing some of them into the LLVM testsuite, but I've decided > to wait until there is some

Re: [llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: nested function support (w/o trampolines)

2007-02-06 Thread Duncan Sands
A better testcase. This doesn't mean it's good, just better :) The gcc testsuite contains more comprehensive tests. I thought of importing some of them into the LLVM testsuite, but I've decided to wait until there is some kind of consensus as to what should be done about the gcc testsuite in gene