On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> Correction... I do not have eh_arm.cc. I'm at revision 301, and I
> certainly pulled in something that requires eh_arm.cc.
The fix should hit the mirror tonight
-Chris
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-
Correction... I do not have eh_arm.cc. I'm at revision 301, and I
certainly pulled in something that requires eh_arm.cc.
Jeff Cohen wrote:
> Yep... clean build.
>
> Dale Johannesen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The build of llvm-gcc is now broken on
Yep... clean build.
Dale Johannesen wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote:
>
>> The build of llvm-gcc is now broken on other platforms:
>>
>> Making install in libsupc++
>> gmake[2]: Entering directory
>> `/usr/home/jeffc/llvm-gcc/obj/amd64-unknown-freebsd6.2/libstdc++-v3/libsup
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> The build of llvm-gcc is now broken on other platforms:
>
> Making install in libsupc++
> gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/home/jeffc/llvm-gcc/obj/amd64-
> unknown-freebsd6.2/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++'
> gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `eh_arm.
The build of llvm-gcc is now broken on other platforms:
Making install in libsupc++
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/home/jeffc/llvm-gcc/obj/amd64-unknown-freebsd6.2/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++'
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `eh_arm.lo', needed by
`libsupc++convenience.la'. Stop.
Dale Joh
On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:49 AM, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
> Files missed:
> ? libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_arm.cc
> ? libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_call.cc
> ? gcc/config/arm/libunwind.S
> ? gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
> ? gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
> ? gcc/config/arm/unalig
Files missed:
? libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_arm.cc
? libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_call.cc
? gcc/config/arm/libunwind.S
? gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
? gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
? gcc/config/arm/unaligned-funcs.c
? gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.h
Lauro
2007/4/3, Lauro R
The file eh_arm.cc wasn't committed. It is in the patch. I can't test
and see if other files are missing because the patch doesn't reach the
public svn yet.
Lauro
2007/4/3, Devang Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:34 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
> > I'm getting this error during
On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:34 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> I'm getting this error during llvm-gcc compilation:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `eh_arm.cc', needed by
> `eh_arm.lo'. Stop.
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
This is related to Lauro Ramos Venancio's patch Dale committ
