On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Bill.
>
>> +// ASM variant to use.
>> +enum {
>> + X86_ATT = 0,
>> + X86_INTEL = 1
>> +};
> There is already assembler flavour defined in Subtarget. Why do you
> need
> some more?
>
Hmm...Good question. It should use this infor
Hello, Bill.
> +// ASM variant to use.
> +enum {
> + X86_ATT = 0,
> + X86_INTEL = 1
> +};
There is already assembler flavour defined in Subtarget. Why do you need
some more?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
__
On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote:
> diff -u llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp:1.7 llvm/lib/
> Target/X86/X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp:1.8
> --- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp:1.7 Tue Oct 31
> 02:31:24 2006
> +++ llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp Tue No
