How about cleaning up the rest of it? There are checks to determine
sanity all for the purpose of producing the message you deleted.
REid.
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 23:04 -0600, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> Changes in directory llvm/autoconf:
>
> configure.ac updated: 1.253 -> 1.254
> ---
> Log message
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Reid Spencer wrote:
> How about cleaning up the rest of it? There are checks to determine
> sanity all for the purpose of producing the message you deleted.
I think that makes a lot of sense, but I don't really feel confident
removing the rest (inexperience with configure).
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 18:42 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Reid Spencer wrote:
> >> Rather than just kill this checking, I would prefer it if the aCC
> >> compiler was added to the check for supported compilers. This
> >> configuration check (that you've deleted) can preve
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Reid Spencer wrote:
>> Rather than just kill this checking, I would prefer it if the aCC
>> compiler was added to the check for supported compilers. This
>> configuration check (that you've deleted) can prevent really bad things
>> happening downstream.
Not trying to be pick
Rather than just kill this checking, I would prefer it if the aCC
compiler was added to the check for supported compilers. This
configuration check (that you've deleted) can prevent really bad things
happening downstream.
REid.
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 21:16 -0600, Duraid Madina wrote:
>
> Changes
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Reid Spencer wrote:
Rather than just kill this checking, I would prefer it if the aCC
compiler was added to the check for supported compilers. This
configuration check (that you've deleted) can prevent really bad things
happening downstream.
FWIW, I agree with reid.
-Chris