Applied.
-
Devang
On Jan 21, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>> + $(F95_OBJS) $(F95_BACKEND) $(F95_LIBS) $(C_STUBS)
>>
>> I don't see C_STUBS anywhere.
>
> Indeed - well spotted.
>
>> Would it be possible for you to resend
>> this patch with appropriate "APPLE LOCAL llvm" markers
> > + $(F95_OBJS) $(F95_BACKEND) $(F95_LIBS) $(C_STUBS)
>
> I don't see C_STUBS anywhere.
Indeed - well spotted.
> Would it be possible for you to resend
> this patch with appropriate "APPLE LOCAL llvm" markers ?
This time without C_STUBS and with markers.
Best wishes,
Duncan.
I
On Jan 17, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Link with the common stub routines, and remove the partial set of
> stubs that were defined in the front-end. With this, the fortran
> compiler builds, but dies when compiling libgfortran:
>
> llvm-convert.cpp:4243: static llvm::Constant*
> Tr
Link with the common stub routines, and remove the partial set of
stubs that were defined in the front-end. With this, the fortran
compiler builds, but dies when compiling libgfortran:
llvm-convert.cpp:4243: static llvm::Constant*
TreeConstantToLLVM::Convert(tree_node*):
Assertion `((__e
