Re: [llvm-commits] New llvm-test regressions

2007-04-09 Thread Jeff Cohen
Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Changes in the last 24 hours have caused additional failures in >> llvm-tests: burg, spiff, lencode, espresso and cdecl. > > These (and many others) all failed for my tester last night, but seem > ok. Make sure to update

Re: [llvm-commits] New llvm-test regressions

2007-04-09 Thread Jeff Cohen
Reid Spencer wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:16 -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote: Changes in the last 24 hours have caused additional failures in llvm-tests: burg, spiff, lencode, espresso and cdecl. I have been assuming these are a result of the PR1146 changes which require llvm-gcc changes.

Re: [llvm-commits] New llvm-test regressions

2007-04-09 Thread Chris Lattner
On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Changes in the last 24 hours have caused additional failures in > llvm-tests: burg, spiff, lencode, espresso and cdecl. These (and many others) all failed for my tester last night, but seem ok. Make sure to update your llvm-gcc tree. -Chris __

Re: [llvm-commits] New llvm-test regressions

2007-04-09 Thread Reid Spencer
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:16 -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Changes in the last 24 hours have caused additional failures in > llvm-tests: burg, spiff, lencode, espresso and cdecl. I have been assuming these are a result of the PR1146 changes which require llvm-gcc changes. Is that the issue or someth

[llvm-commits] New llvm-test regressions

2007-04-09 Thread Jeff Cohen
Changes in the last 24 hours have caused additional failures in llvm-tests: burg, spiff, lencode, espresso and cdecl. ___ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits