Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/ispositive.ll

2007-04-30 Thread Reid Spencer
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:29:17 -0700 Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Reid, why are you duplicating these tests? Because they need to be. Such tests will cause false regressions if LLVM is not built with support for all the targets used in the test case. Duplicating them into the vario

Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/ispositive.ll

2007-04-29 Thread Chris Lattner
Reid, why are you duplicating these tests? -Chris On Apr 29, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Changes in directory llvm/test/CodeGen/X86: > > ispositive.ll added (r1.1) > --- > Log message: > > For PR1370: http://llvm.org/PR1370 : > Rearrange some tests so that if PowerPC is not bei

[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/ispositive.ll

2007-04-29 Thread Reid Spencer
Changes in directory llvm/test/CodeGen/X86: ispositive.ll added (r1.1) --- Log message: For PR1370: http://llvm.org/PR1370 : Rearrange some tests so that if PowerPC is not being built we don't try to run PowerPC specific tests. --- Diffs of the changes: (+9 -0) ispositive.ll |9 +++