On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Bill.
>
>> +// ASM variant to use.
>> +enum {
>> + X86_ATT = 0,
>> + X86_INTEL = 1
>> +};
> There is already assembler flavour defined in Subtarget. Why do you
> need
> some more?
>
Hmm...Good question. It should use this infor
Hello, Bill.
> +// ASM variant to use.
> +enum {
> + X86_ATT = 0,
> + X86_INTEL = 1
> +};
There is already assembler flavour defined in Subtarget. Why do you need
some more?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
__
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp updated: 1.25 -> 1.26
X86TargetAsmInfo.h updated: 1.3 -> 1.4
---
Log message:
Fix for PR1095: http://llvm.org/PR1095 :
LLVM would miscompile ASM dialects when compiling for PPC. Added dialects for
the X86 and PPC backends. It defaul
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp updated: 1.9 -> 1.10
X86TargetAsmInfo.h updated: 1.2 -> 1.3
---
Log message:
Trivially lower 'bswap $0' into llvm.bswap. This fixes hexxagon with the
JIT on darwin/x86, which has htonl implemented as inline asm.
---
Diffs of the
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp added (r1.1)
X86TargetAsmInfo.h added (r1.1)
---
Log message:
Break out target asm info into separate files.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+126 -0)
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp | 95 +++
X
