AlexVlx wrote:
@tstellar apologies for the delay in circling back to this; here are the three
options we have here, neither of which is ideal, sadly:
1. We backport this, #127528 and #128166 (if it gets approved & merged); these
have to go together, and are, as you observed, a bit of a chonk;
AlexVlx wrote:
Hmm, I might need to reparse this but I'm not entirely sure how this is
expected to work in general since PCI-E attachment is not always / entirely
knowable at compile time. Have I missed some preamble discussion here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96442